Corrigendum
for Medina-Bombardó et al., Fam. Pract. 20 (2) 103-107.
Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 5, 619-621
© Oxford University Press 2003
Corrigendum
Medina-Bombardó D, Seguí-Díaz M, Roca-Fusalba C, Llobera J and the dysuria team. What is the predictive value of urinary symptoms for diagnosing urinary tract infection in women?
Family Practice 2003;
20: 103107.
The authors have detected mistakes which were made in the calculation of the confidence intervals given in Tables 1 and 2
. The corrected tables follow with the authors apologies. The mistakes, however, do not change the conclusion drawn from the results.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1 Relative frequency and sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and 95% CIs of the study variables
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2 Positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and 95% CI for the combinations of urinary symptoms and some variables by medical history, general accompanying symptoms. signs and results of urinary strip test
|
|

CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?