Family Practice Vol. 11, No. 3, 307-317
© Oxford University Press 1994
research-article |
Primary Care, Financing and Gatekeeping in Western Europe
,**
*Equipo CESCA Madrid
Primary Care Unit, Escuela Nacional de Sanidad Madrid, Spain
**Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health Baltimore, MD, USA
Primary care in western Europe is delivered by general practitioners (GPs) but their role within the overall health system is poorly understood. The aim of this article is to present an overview of the characteristics of general practice in the context of health systems and to describe their variability and interrelationships. Data were obtained from two main sources: publications of official organizations and EC research projects. The characteristics of general practice are described and analysed with regard to three features: mode of payment, gatekeeper function and practice organization and workload. Despite their focus on general practice as the cornerstone of the health system, western European countries differ considerably in the major characteristics of primary care. There is variability in the ratio of GPs to population and in the extent to which patients relate to individual physicians. Although all countries have universal health in surance, the mode of payment of GPs differs. In some countries, the gatekeeper function of general practice is more highly developed and the use of specialist services varies accordingly. Practice characteristics such as workload, length of consultation, ordering of tests and reappointments also vary with differences in payment and gatekeeping arrangements. In particular, fee-for-service was associated with weaker physician-patient relationships, reduced attractiveness of general practice, more home visiting and longer consultations. Strong gatekeeping arrangements are not incompatible with high public satisfaction and are associated with lower visit rates. However, strong gatekeeping is not characteristic of fee-for-service arrangements. These findings suggest a need for more concerted research that could inform policy decisions concerning primary care in the USA as well as in Europe.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Ashworth, M. Jenkins, K. Burgess, H. Keynes, M. Wallace, D. Roberts, and A. Majeed Which general practices have higher list inflation? An exploratory study Fam. Pract., October 1, 2005; 22(5): 529 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. B Forrest Primary care in the United States: Primary care gatekeeping and referrals: effective filter or failed experiment? BMJ, March 29, 2003; 326(7391): 692 - 695. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Sandvik and H.-J. Cho Attitudes to family practice registration programmes. Survey of Korean and Norwegian family doctors Fam. Pract., February 1, 2002; 19(1): 72 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Tamblyn, M. Abrahamowicz, C. Brailovsky, P. Grand'Maison, J. Lescop, J. Norcini, N. Girard, and J. Haggerty Association Between Licensing Examination Scores and Resource Use and Quality of Care in Primary Care Practice JAMA, September 16, 1998; 280(11): 989 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Halm, N. Causino, and D. Blumenthal Is Gatekeeping Better Than Traditional Care? A Survey of Physicians' Attitudes JAMA, November 26, 1997; 278(20): 1677 - 1681. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. B. Goldstein, A. Farmer, and D. B. Matchar Primary Care Physician–Reported Secondary and Tertiary Stroke Prevention Practices : A Comparison Between the United States and the United Kingdom Stroke, April 1, 1997; 28(4): 746 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|