Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tabenkin, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kitai, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tabenkin, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kitai, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice, Vol 15, 158-164, Copyright © 1998 by World Organization of Family Doctors


ORIGINAL CLINICAL RESEARCH

Referrals of patients by family physicians to consultants: a survey of the Israeli Family Practice Research Network

H Tabenkin, B Oren, D Steinmetz, A Tamir and E Kitai
Department of Family Medicine, Northern Region and H'emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyse factors influencing referral of patients by primary care physicians to specialist consultants at the beginning of the era of direct access to specialists in Israel. METHODS: We carried out a study of referrals by family physicians to specialists over a continuous period of 3 months. Twenty-four certified family physicians filled in a questionnaire detailing referrals during the study period. All patients were referred for consultation to a specialist at regional speciality clinics or hospital out-patient departments. RESULTS: Ten physicians met the study conditions. In 1140 of 10896 (10.5%) visits, patients were referred to specialist consultants. The percentage of referral ranged from 7.4 to 15.9%. The difference between the physicians with the lowest and highest rates of referral was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). The variance in referral rates was not explained by significant differences in physician or practice variables. The types of specialists to whom the most referrals were made were orthopaedic surgeons, ophthalmologists, dermatologists, ear, nose and throat, general surgeons and plastic surgeons. There was a significant correlation between the type of specialist and the age of the patient. Older patients were referred more frequently to urologists, cardiologists and ophthalmologists, while younger patients were referred more frequently to ear, nose and throat specialists and gynaecologists (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study can be used as an aid for decision makers in the health services for determining policy. Direct access to some specialties might be appropriate, but not to all. Adoption of a policy based on these findings could lead to reduced health care costs by reducing the burden on hospital emergency rooms. It might also increase patient satisfaction in that the patients will have greater freedom of choice. On the other hand, more appropriate training of family physicians and more extensive self- and peer-quality assurance will increase the primary physician's knowledge and ability to diagnose and treat a broad range of problems and improve the level of care.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
D E. Feldman, O Schieir, A J Montcalm, S Bernatsky, M Baron, and The McGill Early Inflammatory Arthritis Research G
Rapidity of rheumatology consultation for people in an early inflammatory arthritis cohort
Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2009; 68(11): 1790 - 1791.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. B. Forrest
A Typology of Specialists' Clinical Roles
Arch Intern Med, June 8, 2009; 169(11): 1062 - 1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.