Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (71)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howie, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howie, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice, Vol 15, 165-171, Copyright © 1998 by World Organization of Family Doctors


ORIGINAL CLINICAL RESEARCH

A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations

JG Howie, DJ Heaney, M Maxwell and JJ Walker
University of Edinburgh, Department of General Practice, UK.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare a new primary care outcome measure-the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI)-against two established satisfaction measures [the Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS) and the Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)]. Specifically, we sought (i) to test whether enablement and satisfaction are related or separate concepts; and (ii) to assess whether the internal consistency of the PEI might be enhanced by the inclusion of items from the satisfaction instruments. METHODS: Questionnaire forms containing the three instruments in a variety of combinations were distributed to a total of 818 patients attending for routine surgery consultations in three urban general practices of varying socio-economic mix. The main outcome measures were: scores on the PEI; scores on the CSQ, the MISS and their individual components; rank correlations between scores on the PEI and scores on the CSQ, the MISS and their component subscales; and Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the PEI. RESULTS: Overall mean scores, expressed as percentages of maximum scores attainable, were 44.1% for the PEI, 76.9% for the CSQ and 77.6% for the MISS. Rank correlations between PEI scores and scores for the complete CSQ and MISS instruments were 0.48 (P < 0.01) and 0.47 (P < 0.01), respectively. Correlations of PEI scores with individual component scores on the CSQ were generally lower and ranged from 0.14 to 0.53; correlations of PEI scored with MISS component scores were also generally lower and ranged from 0.21 to 0.53. Internal consistency of the PEI items (assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient) was lowered when items from the CSQ or MISS were added. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that 'enablement' is a primary care outcome measure which is related to but is different from general satisfaction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
N. A Francis, C. C Butler, K. Hood, S. Simpson, F. Wood, and J. Nuttall
Effect of using an interactive booklet about childhood respiratory tract infections in primary care consultations on reconsulting and antibiotic prescribing: a cluster randomised controlled trial
BMJ, July 29, 2009; 339(jul29_2): b2885 - b2885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. W L Cals, C. C Butler, R. M Hopstaken, K. Hood, and G.-J. Dinant
Effect of point of care testing for C reactive protein and training in communication skills on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster randomised trial
BMJ, May 5, 2009; 338(may05_1): b1374 - b1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
R. G Evans, A. Edwards, S. Evans, B. Elwyn, and G. Elwyn
Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: a systematic review of instruments and feedback methods
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2007; 24(2): 117 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
Y. Zhang, J. Rohrer, T. Borders, and T. Farrell
Patient Satisfaction, Self-Rated Health Status, and Health Confidence: An Assessment of the Utility of Single-Item Questions
American Journal of Medical Quality, January 1, 2007; 22(1): 42 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
L. Yardley and S. Kirby
Evaluation of booklet-based self-management of symptoms in meniere disease: a randomized controlled trial.
Psychosom Med, September 1, 2006; 68(5): 762 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
B. McKinstry, I. Colthart, and J. Walker
Can doctors predict patients' satisfaction and enablement? A cross-sectional observational study
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 240 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Benson, T. Quince, A. Hibble, T. Fanshawe, and J. Emery
Impact on patients of expanded, general practice based, student teaching: observational and qualitative study
BMJ, July 9, 2005; 331(7508): 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. F. Long, T. Gambling, R. J. Young, J. Taylor, J. M. Mason, and on behalf of the PACCTS Team
Acceptability and Satisfaction With a Telecarer Approach to the Management of Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2005; 28(2): 283 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
S. W Mercer, M. Maxwell, D. Heaney, and G. C. Watt
The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2004; 21(6): 699 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
A Edwards, G Elwyn, K Hood, C Atwell, M Robling, H Houston, P Kinnersley, I Russell, and the Study Steering Group
Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2004; 21(4): 347 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
J. Howie, D Heaney, and M Maxwell
Quality, core values and the general practice consultation: issues of definition, measurement and delivery
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2004; 21(4): 458 - 468.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
T. Greenhalgh and S. Wessely
'Health for me': a sociocultural analysis of healthism in the middle classes
Br. Med. Bull., June 1, 2004; 69(1): 197 - 213.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. M Boynton and T. Greenhalgh
Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire
BMJ, May 29, 2004; 328(7451): 1312 - 1315.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
B. McKinstry, J. Walker, D. Blaney, D. Heaney, and D. Begg
Do patients and expert doctors agree on the assessment of consultation skills?: A comparison of two patient consultation assessment scales with the video component of the MRCGP
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2004; 21(1): 75 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Jiwa and N. Mathers
Telephone consultations are routinely used
BMJ, August 9, 2003; 327(7410): 345 - 345.
[Full Text]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
C. McGUINESS and B. SIBTHORPE
Development and initial validation of a measure of coordination of health care
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2003; 15(4): 309 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P B Jacklin, J A Roberts, P Wallace, A Haines, R Harrison, J A Barber, S G Thompson, L Lewis, R Currell, S Parker, et al.
Virtual outreach: economic evaluation of joint teleconsultations for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion
BMJ, July 10, 2003; 327(7406): 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
Poster presentations
Thorax, December 1, 2002; 57(90003): iii48 - 94.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
P. Bower, N. Mead, and M. Roland
What dimensions underlie patient responses to the General Practice Assessment Survey? A factor analytic study
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2002; 19(5): 489 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. C. Butler, P. Kinnersley, H. Prout, S. Rollnick, A. Edwards, and G. Elwyn
Antibiotics and shared decision-making in primary care
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2001; 48(3): 435 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
S. M Oliver
Living with failing lungs: the doctor-patient relationship
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2001; 18(4): 430 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
J. G. Howie, D. J Heaney, M. Maxwell, J. J Walker, and G. K Freeman
Developing a 'consultation quality index' (CQI) for use in general practice
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2000; 17(6): 455 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
J. Ramsay, J. L Campbell, S. Schroter, J. Green, and M. Roland
The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2000; 17(5): 372 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P Venning, A Durie, M Roland, C Roberts, and B Leese
Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care
BMJ, April 15, 2000; 320(7241): 1048 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
S. Haddad, L. Potvin, D. Roberge, R. Pineault, and M. Remondin
Patient perception of quality following a visit to a doctor in a primary care unit
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2000; 17(1): 21 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. G R Howie, D. J Heaney, M. Maxwell, J. J Walker, G. K Freeman, and H. Rai
Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey
BMJ, September 18, 1999; 319(7212): 738 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
R. Jankowski
What do hospital admission rates say about primary care?
BMJ, July 10, 1999; 319(7202): 67 - 68.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.