Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laerum, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lundevall, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laerum, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lundevall, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice, Vol 15, 172-181, Copyright © 1998 by World Organization of Family Doctors


ORIGINAL CLINICAL RESEARCH

Complex health problems in general practice: do we need an instrument for consultation improvement and patient involvement? Theoretical foundation, development and user evaluation of the Patient Perspective Survey (PPS)

E Laerum, S Steine, A Finset and S Lundevall
Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Blindern, Norway.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many patients in general practice present with complex health problems. It is argued that the GP who is in a prime position to counsel patients with such problems, will, however, often perceive a lack of tools to manage them. The aim of the present study was to develop a novel instrument in terms of a patient- administered questionnaire, the Patient Perspective Survey (PPS), designed to enhance the quality of clinical communication in the consultation. It is based on a biopsychosocial patient perspective, patient centredness, patient resources, involvement and coping, and quality of life orientation. METHODS: Development of the PPS has included comprehensive literature research, discussions and advice, during several phases, from groups of GPs, patients, broad panels of experts and testing in pilot studies. After many revisions, a 102-item version, consisting of a main somatic, mental and social domain axis, was evaluated by GPs and patients in 213 consultations. RESULTS: The basic idea, theoretical elements and purpose of the PPS appeared in general to be well accepted. Seventy-five to eighty-five per cent of the patients found the questions relevant and easy to understand and there were high positive scorings regarding influence on the doctor- patient relationship, communication, resource and coping aspects, occurrence of new information and general satisfaction with the consultation. Similar scorings were obtained from the GPs' evaluation. Both parties agreed that there is a need for a shorter and more specific PPS version, and that the resource and coping dimension should be even more extended. CONCLUSIONS: We consider it well documented that there is a need for this new instrument to deal with complex health problems in general practice, and that it has promising potentials for consultation improvement.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
C. McGUINESS and B. SIBTHORPE
Development and initial validation of a measure of coordination of health care
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2003; 15(4): 309 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
H. Thorsen, K. Witt, H. Hollnagel, and K. Malterud
The purpose of the general practice consultation from the patient's perspective--theoretical aspects
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2001; 18(6): 638 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Stewart
Towards a global definition of patient centred care
BMJ, February 24, 2001; 322(7284): 444 - 445.
[Full Text]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
B. Nilsson and G. Westman
The impact of patients' influence on recovery in a group of patients with dyspepsia
Fam. Pract., October 1, 1999; 16(5): 515 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.