Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Silva, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mendis, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Silva, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mendis, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice, Vol 15, 323-331, Copyright © 1998 by World Organization of Family Doctors


ORIGINAL CLINICAL RESEARCH

One-day general practice morbidity survey in Sri Lanka

N de Silva and K Mendis
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.

BACKGROUND: National morbidity surveys provide valuable data for monitoring the health needs of populations, health policy planning and design of medical curricula. In order to meet a long-standing need for such information in Sri Lanka, a nationwide general practice morbidity survey was conducted for the first time in 1996. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify people's needs by determining the reasons for encounter or the demand for care with GPs/family physicians, to illustrate the pattern of morbidity in general practice and to determine the average daily workload of GPs in Sri Lanka. METHOD: A random sample of 75 GPs were requested to complete a Practitioner Profile Questionnaire (PPQ) and to record on an encounter form (EF) the reason/s for encounter (RFE) and problems managed during all consultations on 4 July. Central coding of the RFEs and problems defined was done using the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC). RESULTS: Forty GPs (53.3%) completed the PPQ, while the EF received a response from 34 (43.3%). The GP profile showed a male to female ratio of 7:1, none below 35 years and none qualified after 1984. The average daily workload was 74. It was estimated that GPs handle at least 26.5% of the primary care morbidity. Children accounted for 32% of consultations. There was a significantly higher proportion of children (P < 0.0001) and of the elderly (P < 0.05) in the consulting population compared with the general population. In 2068 encounters, 3448 RFEs and 2087 problems had been recorded. Respiratory and General chapters included 55% of the RFEs. By ICPC rubrics, 27 of the top thirty RFEs were for common symptoms. In addition to acute illnesses, asthma, hypertension and diabetes as well as preventive care activities were within the top 12 problems managed. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that many common illnesses, chronic diseases and preventive treatments are dealt with in general practice shows the necessity to include family medicine in the undergraduate curriculum of all medical schools. Undergraduate and postgraduate training in family medicine should concentrate more on child care and care of the elderly. Suitable incentives may be necessary to motivate younger doctors to become GPs to meet the medical care needs of the community.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
H. Sandvik and H.-J. Cho
Attitudes to family practice registration programmes. Survey of Korean and Norwegian family doctors
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2002; 19(1): 72 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.