Family Practice Vol. 16, No. 1, 4-11
© Oxford University Press 1999
Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison
Centre for Quality of Care Research, Universities of Nijmegen/Maastricht, The Netherlands,
a Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Denmark,
b Centre for Social Studies, University Coimbra, Portugal,
c Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit, University of Leicester, UK,
d Department of General Practice, University of Oslo, Norway,
e Department of Family Medicine, University of Uppsala, Sweden,
f Department of Family Health Care, The Technion, Haifa, Israel and
g Institute on Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Göttingen, Germany.
Background and objectives. Improving the sensitivity of general practice to Patients' needs demands a good understanding of Patients' expectations and priorities in care provision. Insight into differences in expectations of patients in different cultures and health care systems may support decision-making on desirable models for care provision in general practice. An international study was conducted to determine priorities of patients in general practice care: which views do patients in different countries have in common and which views differ?
Methods. Written surveys in general practices in the UK, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, The Netherlands, Germany, Portugal and Israel were performed. Samples of patients from at least 12 practices per country, stratified according to area and type of practice, were included. Patients rated the importance of 38 different aspects of general practice care, selected on the basis of literature analysis, qualitative studies and consensus discussions. Rankings between countries were compared.
Results. A total number of 3540 patients (response rate on average 55%) completed the questionnaire. Patients in different countries had many opinions in common. Aspects that got the highest ranking were: getting enough time during the consultation; quick services in case of emergencies; confidentiality of information on patients; telling patients all they want to know about their illness; making patients feel free to talk about their problems; GPs going to courses regularly; and offering preventive services. However, differences between opinions of patients in different countries were also found for some of the selected aspects. A confounding effect of Patients' characteristics may have played a role in these differences.
Discussion. The study provides information on what patients expect of and value in general practice care. It shows that patients in different cultures and health care systems may have different views on some aspects of care, but most of all that they have many views in common, particularly as far as doctor–patient communication and accessibility of services are concerned.
Keywords. Doctor–patient communication, general practice care, international comparison, Patients' expectations, Patients' priorities..
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Marcinowicz, J. Konstantynowicz, and S. Chlabicz The patient's view of the acceptability of the primary care in Poland Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2008; 20(4): 277 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A Delgado, L Andres Lopez-Fernandez, J de Dios Luna, N Gil, M Jimenez, and A Puga Patient expectations are not always the same J. Epidemiol. Community Health, May 1, 2008; 62(5): 427 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Robertson, A. Dixon, and J. Le Grand Patient choice in general practice: the implications of patient satisfaction surveys J Health Serv Res Policy, April 1, 2008; 13(2): 67 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Engels, M. Dautzenberg, S. Campbell, B. Broge, N. Boffin, M. Marshall, G. Elwyn, V. Vodopivec-Jamsek, F. M Gerlach, M. Samuelson, et al. Testing a European set of indicators for the evaluation of the management of primary care practices Fam. Pract., February 1, 2006; 23(1): 137 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Engels, S. Campbell, M. Dautzenberg, P. van den Hombergh, H. Brinkmann, J. Szecsenyi, H. Falcoff, L. Seuntjens, B. Kuenzi, and R. Grol Developing a framework of, and quality indicators for, general practice management in Europe Fam. Pract., April 1, 2005; 22(2): 215 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Ammentorp, J. Mainz, and S. Sabroe Parents' Priorities and Satisfaction With Acute Pediatric Care Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2005; 159(2): 127 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. T. Britto, R. F. DeVellis, R. W. Hornung, G. H. DeFriese, H. D. Atherton, and G. B. Slap Health Care Preferences and Priorities of Adolescents With Chronic Illnesses Pediatrics, November 1, 2004; 114(5): 1272 - 1280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Schmidt, B.E. Holstein, J. Boivin, T. Tjornhoj-Thomsen, J. Blaabjerg, F. Hald, P.E. Rasmussen, and A. Nyboe Andersen High ratings of satisfaction with fertility treatment are common: findings from the Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI) Research Programme Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2638 - 2646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Bremberg, T. Nilstun, V. Kovac, and M. Zwitter GPs facing reluctant and demanding patients: analysing ethical justifications Fam. Pract., June 1, 2003; 20(3): 254 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Wensing and G. Elwyn Improving the quality of health care: Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care BMJ, April 19, 2003; 326(7394): 877 - 879. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. BANKAUSKAITE and O. SAARELMA Why are people dissatisfied with medical care services in Lithuania? A qualitative study using responses to open-ended questions Int. J. Qual. Health Care, February 1, 2003; 15(1): 23 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Vedsted, J. Mainz, T. Lauritzen, and F. Olesen Patient and GP agreement on aspects of general practice care Fam. Pract., August 1, 2002; 19(4): 339 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. S. Mol, G.-J. Dinant, P. A. Vilters-van Montfort, J. F. Metsemakers, M. van den Akker, A. Arntz, and J A. Knottnerus Traumatic events in a general practice population: the patient's perspective Fam. Pract., August 1, 2002; 19(4): 390 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M Wensing and G Elwyn Research on patients' views in the evaluation and improvement of quality of care Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2002; 11(2): 153 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H P Jung, M Wensing, F Olesen, and R Grol Comparison of patients' and general practitioners' evaluations of general practice care Qual. Saf. Health Care, January 12, 2002; 11(4): 315 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Thorsen, K. Witt, H. Hollnagel, and K. Malterud The purpose of the general practice consultation from the patient's perspective--theoretical aspects Fam. Pract., December 1, 2001; 18(6): 638 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Thesen Being a psychiatric patient in the community- reclassified as the stigmatized "other' ' Scand J Public Health, October 1, 2001; 29(4): 248 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Coulter and P. D. Cleary Patients' Experiences With Hospital Care In Five Countries Health Aff., May 1, 2001; 20(3): 244 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O J Kvamme, F Olesen, and M Samuelsson Improving the interface between primary and secondary care: a statement from the European Working Party on Quality in Family Practice (EQuiP) Qual. Saf. Health Care, March 1, 2001; 10(1): 33 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Little, H. Everitt, I. Williamson, G. Warner, M. Moore, C. Gould, K. Ferrier, and S. Payne Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study BMJ, February 24, 2001; 322(7284): 468 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Wensing Evidence-based patient empowerment Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2000; 9(4): 200 - 201. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Ramsay, J. L Campbell, S. Schroter, J. Green, and M. Roland The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties Fam. Pract., October 1, 2000; 17(5): 372 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Kersnik Observational study of home visits in Slovene general practice: patient characteristics, practice characteristics and health care utilization Fam. Pract., October 1, 2000; 17(5): 389 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Jung, M Wensing, A de Wilt, F Olesen, and R Grol Comparison of patients' preferences and evaluations regarding aspects of general practice care Fam. Pract., June 1, 2000; 17(3): 236 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Britten, F. A Stevenson, C. A Barry, N. Barber, and C. P Bradley Misunderstandings in prescribing decisions in general practice: qualitative study BMJ, February 19, 2000; 320(7233): 484 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|