Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 16, No. 3, 216-222
© Oxford University Press 1999

Guidelines for low back pain: changes in GP management

Ben SM Frankel, Jennifer Klaber Moffetta, Steven Keen and David Jacksona

Nuffield Institute for Health, University of Leeds and
a Institute of Rehabilitation, University of Hull, UK.

Ben SM Frankel, 19 Cheltenham Terrace, Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE65HR, UK.

Background. Management guidelines are aimed at reducing inappropriate practice and im-proving efficiency; however, the effectiveness of many guidelines has yet to be confirmed. This study targets GPs' management of back pain and its relationship with the recent management guidelines.

Objectives. We aimed to investigate changes in GP management of low back pain, low back pain episode duration and time before consultation, over a 5-year period.

Method. A case series report of 574 patient notes was collected from a large practice in North Yorkshire (January 1992–March 1997). In addition, 713 referral notes from 26 practices across North Yorkshire were collected. The patients were potential subjects for a larger randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of an exercise programme. Both groups of data were analysed by identifying trends over time and using log linear regression.

Results. Recommendation of activity or exercise was found to be a trend increasing over time. In contrast, recommendation to rest was found to be a trend decreasing over time. Activity or exercise was more frequently recommended to younger patients. There was evidence that individuals are seeking a GP consultation more quickly.

Conclusions. The gap between GP practice and the recent guidelines appears to be reducing. However, many variations in practice still exist. Evidence of decreasing time before consultations may indicate that the level of self-care by low back pain patients is decreasing. Although management guidelines may have some effect, there is some way to go before back pain management is optimized.

Keywords. GP intervention, low back pain, physical exercise, rest.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. Manca, J. C. Dumville, D. J. Torgerson, J. A. Klaber Moffett, M. P. Mooney, D. A. Jackson, and S. Eaton
Randomized trial of two physiotherapy interventions for primary care back and neck pain patients: cost effectiveness analysis
Rheumatology, September 1, 2007; 46(9): 1495 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Scand J Public HealthHome page
C. Ihlebaek and H. R. Eriksen
Are the ``myths'' of low back pain alive in the general Norwegian population?
Scand J Public Health, October 1, 2003; 31(5): 395 - 398.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.