Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sturmberg, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sturmberg, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 17, No. 1, 16-20
© Oxford University Press 2000

Continuity of care: towards a definition based on experiences of practising GPs

JP Sturmberg

Department of Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia.

Background. The traditional concept of continuity of care, i.e. care from the cradle to the grave, is no longer sustainable in modern society.

Objective. The aim of this study was to propose a definition of ‘continuity of care’ based on the experiences of a group of practising Australian GPs.

Method. Five focus group discussions were conducted to explore the understanding and practice of continuity of care, the individual's measurement of having achieved continuity of care in his/her practice and the advantages/disadvantages of providing continuity of care.

Results and conclusions. The experiences of this group of GPs points towards three essential aspects to help with a definition of continuity of care. Firstly it requires a stable care environment, secondly good communication to build a responsible doctor–patient relationship and thirdly the goal of achieving an improvement of the patient's overall health.

Keywords. Comprehensiveness of care, continuity of care, co-ordination of care, general practice, primary care..


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
E. Michiels, R. Deschepper, G. Van Der Kelen, J. L. Bernheim, F. Mortier, R. Vander Stichele, and L. Deliens
The role of general practitioners in continuity of care at the end of life: a qualitative study of terminally ill patients and their next of kin
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2007; 21(5): 409 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Med Care Res RevHome page
S. H. Jee and M. D. Cabana
Indices for Continuity of Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Med Care Res Rev, April 1, 2006; 63(2): 158 - 188.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
I. von Bultzingslowen, G. Eliasson, A. Sarvimaki, B. Mattsson, and P. Hjortdahl
Patients' views on interpersonal continuity in primary care: a sense of security based on four core foundations
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 210 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
J. W. Saultz
Defining and Measuring Interpersonal Continuity of Care
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2003; 1(3): 134 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
U. Krogstad, D. Hofoss, and P. Hjortdahl
Continuity of hospital care: beyond the question of personal contact
BMJ, January 5, 2002; 324(7328): 36 - 38.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.