Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haddad, S.
Right arrow Articles by Remondin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haddad, S.
Right arrow Articles by Remondin, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 17, No. 1, 21-29
© Oxford University Press 2000

Patient perception of quality following a visit to a doctor in a primary care unit

Slim Haddad, Louise Potvin, Danièle Robergea, Raynald Pineault and Martine Remondina

Groupe de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Santé and
a Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, PQ, Canada.

Slim Haddad, Université de Montréal, Groupe de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Santé, Pavillon Marguerite d'Youville, C.P. 6128, Succursale A, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7 Canada.

Background. Assessment of the quality of primary care services may be enhanced by including patient perceptions as well as professional judgment of quality. There is a need for reliable and valid instruments to measure these perceptions.

Objectives. (i) To present a scale for measuring patient perception of quality of care following a visit to a doctor; and (ii) to analyse the responses given by patients recruited in primary care units in the Montreal region. The scale is composed of 22 items regrouped into three sub-scales referring to the patient–physician relationship (five items); the technical aspects of care (12 items); and the outcomes of the visit (five items). Distinctive features of the scale are that it focuses on patients' opinions about quality rather than on satisfaction, and that it includes items related to outcomes of the visit.

Methods. A survey was conducted on 473 patients who visited a physician in 11 primary care units in the Montreal region. Randomly selected patients received mailed questionnaires 5–7 days following their visit. Various statistical procedures were used to assess the reliability and the validity of the global scale and the sub-scales, and to analyse patients' patterns of response.

Results. The analysis of the psychometric properties of the global scale and the three sub-scales provides favourable evidence concerning their reliability and validity. The results of the factor analysis, the inter-item correlations and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients all support the distinction made between the interpersonal processes, the technical processes and the outcomes, and, at the same time, confirm the complex nature of the notion of perceived quality. The analysis of patients' responses allows the identification of items associated with global perception about quality of care. This global perception results from patients' perception of the physician's professional and interpersonal skills as well as from the outcomes of care.

Conclusion. The scale can be used by physicians or primary health care units and has a wide range of applications.

Keywords. Measurement, patient perception, primary care, quality of care..


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J Qual Health CareHome page
P. M. Hansen, D. H. Peters, K. Viswanathan, K. D. Rao, A. Mashkoor, and G. Burnham
Client perceptions of the quality of primary care services in Afghanistan
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2008; 20(6): 384 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
R. G Evans, A. Edwards, S. Evans, B. Elwyn, and G. Elwyn
Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: a systematic review of instruments and feedback methods
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2007; 24(2): 117 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Qual Health CareHome page
K. D. Rao, D. H. Peters, and K. Bandeen-Roche
Towards patient-centered health services in India--a scale to measure patient perceptions of quality
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2006; 18(6): 414 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
J. W. Mack, J. M. Hilden, J. Watterson, C. Moore, B. Turner, H. E. Grier, J. C. Weeks, and J. Wolfe
Parent and Physician Perspectives on Quality of Care at the End of Life in Children With Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9155 - 9161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
H. Kolk, H.-I. Maaroos, I. Kull, K. Labotkin, K. Loivukene, and M. Mikelsaar
Open access endoscopy in an epidemiological situation of high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: applicability of the guidelines of the European Society for Primary Care Gastroenterology
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2002; 19(3): 231 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.