Family Practice Vol. 17, No. 4, 298-304
© Oxford University Press 2000
Socio-economic characteristics of adult frequent attenders in general practice: secondary analysis of data
a Sub-Unit for Medical Statistics, Nuffield Institute for Health and
b Centre for Research in Primary Care, University of Leeds, Leeds and
c Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
PS Gill, Senior Lecturer, Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Objective. This study was carried out to determine the effect of a range of socio-economic features on frequent attendance in general practice from a large database of general practice consultations using two definitions of frequent attendance.
Methods. Secondary analyses were carried out of data from the Fourth National Survey of Morbidity in General Practice covering 60 general practices in England and Wales. A total of 283 842 adult patients and their consultations between September 1991 and August 1992 were examined. The main outcome measure was the odds ratio of being a frequent attender (95% confidence intervals).
Results. Using a definition of 12+ consultations/year, men were less likely to be frequent attenders (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.130.17); however, the difference between men and women lessens with age. Patients who were more likely to be frequent attenders included those who were divorced or widowed (1.41, 1.311.51); from social classes IIIM (1.23, 1.171.29) and IV/V (1.33, 1.261.41); South Asian people (1.38, 1.161.65); or unemployed (1.61, 1.461.77). Other factors signifying isolation or poverty were also linked to frequent attendance. Using the definition of 6+ consultations for minor problems produced broadly similar results although the relative weight of the factors showed some differences.
Conclusions. Socio-economic factors were important indicators of frequent attendance in general practice. Results were very similar using either definition, suggesting that both are valid for further work. Furthermore, frequent attendance is a complex process associated with many factors outside the control of the GP.
Keywords. Frequent attenders, general practice.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. S Donnelly, R. L Shaw, and O. B. van den Akker eHealth as a challenge to 'expert' power: a focus group study of internet use for health information and management J R Soc Med, October 1, 2008; 101(10): 501 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Townsend, S. Wyke, and K. Hunt Frequent consulting and multiple morbidity: a qualitative comparison of 'high' and 'low' consulters of GPs Fam. Pract., June 1, 2008; 25(3): 168 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Foster, K. Jordan, and P. Croft Is frequent attendance in primary care disease-specific? Fam. Pract., August 1, 2006; 23(4): 444 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Savageau, M. McLoughlin, A. Ursan, Y. Bai, M. Collins, and S. B. Cashman Characteristics of frequent attenders at a community health center. J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2006; 19(3): 265 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Busato, A. Donges, S. Herren, M. Widmer, and F. Marian Health status and health care utilisation of patients in complementary and conventional primary care in Switzerland--an observational study Fam. Pract., February 1, 2006; 23(1): 116 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bergh, A. Baigi, and B. Marklund Consultations for injuries by frequent attenders are found to be medically appropriate from general practitioners' perspective Scand J Public Health, May 1, 2005; 33(3): 228 - 232. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U T Kadam, K Jordan, and P R Croft Clinical comorbidity in patients with osteoarthritis: a case-control study of general practice consulters in England and Wales Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2004; 63(4): 408 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Jordan, B N Ong, and P Croft Previous consultation and self reported health status as predictors of future demand for primary care J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2003; 57(2): 109 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C Tam, L. C Rodrigues, and S. J O'Brien The study of infectious intestinal disease in England: what risk factors for presentation to general practice tell us about potential for selection bias in case-control studies of reported cases of diarrhoea Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2003; 32(1): 99 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






