Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scaife, B
Right arrow Articles by Neal, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scaife, B
Right arrow Articles by Neal, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 17, No. 4, 298-304
© Oxford University Press 2000

Socio-economic characteristics of adult frequent attenders in general practice: secondary analysis of data

B Scaifea, PS Gillb, PL Heywoodc and RD Nealc

a Sub-Unit for Medical Statistics, Nuffield Institute for Health and
b Centre for Research in Primary Care, University of Leeds, Leeds and
c Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

PS Gill, Senior Lecturer, Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

Objective. This study was carried out to determine the effect of a range of socio-economic features on frequent attendance in general practice from a large database of general practice consultations using two definitions of frequent attendance.

Methods. Secondary analyses were carried out of data from the Fourth National Survey of Morbidity in General Practice covering 60 general practices in England and Wales. A total of 283 842 adult patients and their consultations between September 1991 and August 1992 were examined. The main outcome measure was the odds ratio of being a frequent attender (95% confidence intervals).

Results. Using a definition of 12+ consultations/year, men were less likely to be frequent attenders (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.13–0.17); however, the difference between men and women lessens with age. Patients who were more likely to be frequent attenders included those who were divorced or widowed (1.41, 1.31–1.51); from social classes IIIM (1.23, 1.17–1.29) and IV/V (1.33, 1.26–1.41); South Asian people (1.38, 1.16–1.65); or unemployed (1.61, 1.46–1.77). Other factors signifying isolation or poverty were also linked to frequent attendance. Using the definition of ‘6+ consultations for minor problems’ produced broadly similar results although the relative weight of the factors showed some differences.

Conclusions. Socio-economic factors were important indicators of frequent attendance in general practice. Results were very similar using either definition, suggesting that both are valid for further work. Furthermore, frequent attendance is a complex process associated with many factors outside the control of the GP.

Keywords. Frequent attenders, general practice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JRSMHome page
L. S Donnelly, R. L Shaw, and O. B. van den Akker
eHealth as a challenge to 'expert' power: a focus group study of internet use for health information and management
J R Soc Med, October 1, 2008; 101(10): 501 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
A. Townsend, S. Wyke, and K. Hunt
Frequent consulting and multiple morbidity: a qualitative comparison of 'high' and 'low' consulters of GPs
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2008; 25(3): 168 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
A. Foster, K. Jordan, and P. Croft
Is frequent attendance in primary care disease-specific?
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2006; 23(4): 444 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
J. A. Savageau, M. McLoughlin, A. Ursan, Y. Bai, M. Collins, and S. B. Cashman
Characteristics of frequent attenders at a community health center.
J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2006; 19(3): 265 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
A. Busato, A. Donges, S. Herren, M. Widmer, and F. Marian
Health status and health care utilisation of patients in complementary and conventional primary care in Switzerland--an observational study
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2006; 23(1): 116 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
H. Bergh, A. Baigi, and B. Marklund
Consultations for injuries by frequent attenders are found to be medically appropriate from general practitioners' perspective
Scand J Public Health, May 1, 2005; 33(3): 228 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
U T Kadam, K Jordan, and P R Croft
Clinical comorbidity in patients with osteoarthritis: a case-control study of general practice consulters in England and Wales
Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2004; 63(4): 408 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
K Jordan, B N Ong, and P Croft
Previous consultation and self reported health status as predictors of future demand for primary care
J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2003; 57(2): 109 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. C Tam, L. C Rodrigues, and S. J O'Brien
The study of infectious intestinal disease in England: what risk factors for presentation to general practice tell us about potential for selection bias in case-control studies of reported cases of diarrhoea
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2003; 32(1): 99 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.