Family Practice Vol. 17, No. 6, 455-461
© Oxford University Press 2000
Developing a ‘consultation quality index’ (CQI) for use in general practice
University of Edinburgh, Department of Community Health Sciences–General Practice, 20 West Richmond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9DX and
a Imperial College School of Medicine, Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK.
Background. The core values of general practice include holism and patient-centredness. None of the measures of quality of care in general practice presently capture the expression of these values at routine consultations.
Objectives. The aim of the present study was to construct a ‘consultation quality index’ (CQI) which reflects the core values of general practice, using as proxies ‘consultation length’ and how well patients ‘know the doctor’ as process measures and ‘patient enablement’ as an outcome measure.
Methods. The CQI was constructed from data collected from 23 799 adult English-speaking patients consulting 221 doctors in four demographically contrasting areas of the UK during 2 weeks of March/April 1998. A total of 171 doctors who entered 50 qualifying consultations were allocated scores for the three component variables, and a total CQI was calculated.
Results. CQI scores were in the range 4–18. Validity was examined by looking at high and low scorers in greater detail and by searching for correlates with case mix, patient age and gender, and the deprivation scores of the practices concerned. Particular attention was paid to how registrars and doctors new to their practices scored. The scores of different doctors in the same practice were also noted. The results had strong face validity and were independent of case mix and deprivation. Reliability was gauged by examining similar work from a previous study which had collected information on consultation length and enablement over three time periods. High CQI scores were associated with smaller overall practice list sizes.
Conclusions. We have outlined possible uses for the CQI as part of the packages assessing quality of care by doctors and practices. The measure may also have a part to play in recognizing poorly performing doctors. We suggest how CQI scores could contribute to an incentive scheme to reward good consulting practice. Further work is in hand to compare doctors' CQI scores with scores based on performance indicators constructed from routine NHS data on prescribing and preventive medicine.
Keywords. Consultation quality index, general practice, quality of care.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. Ahlen, B Mattsson, and R. Gunnarsson Physician patient questionnaire to assess physician patient agreement at the consultation Fam. Pract., October 1, 2007; 24(5): 498 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Haggerty, F. Burge, J.-F. Levesque, D. Gass, R. Pineault, M.-D. Beaulieu, and D. Santor Operational Definitions of Attributes of Primary Health Care: Consensus Among Canadian Experts Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2007; 5(4): 336 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. G Evans, A. Edwards, S. Evans, B. Elwyn, and G. Elwyn Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: a systematic review of instruments and feedback methods Fam. Pract., April 1, 2007; 24(2): 117 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Zhang, J. Rohrer, T. Borders, and T. Farrell Patient Satisfaction, Self-Rated Health Status, and Health Confidence: An Assessment of the Utility of Single-Item Questions American Journal of Medical Quality, January 1, 2007; 22(1): 42 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. McKinstry, I. Colthart, and J. Walker Can doctors predict patients' satisfaction and enablement? A cross-sectional observational study Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 240 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Howie, D Heaney, and M Maxwell Quality, core values and the general practice consultation: issues of definition, measurement and delivery Fam. Pract., August 1, 2004; 21(4): 458 - 468. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. McKinstry, J. Walker, D. Blaney, D. Heaney, and D. Begg Do patients and expert doctors agree on the assessment of consultation skills?: A comparison of two patient consultation assessment scales with the video component of the MRCGP Fam. Pract., February 1, 2004; 21(1): 75 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P Bower, S Campbell, C Bojke, and B Sibbald Team structure, team climate and the quality of care in primary care: an observational study Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2003; 12(4): 273 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Pollock and J. Grime GPs' perspectives on managing time in consultations with patients suffering from depression: a qualitative study Fam. Pract., June 1, 2003; 20(3): 262 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Roland, D. J Heaney, M. Maxwell, J. Howie, H. A Lee, S. W Mercer, H. Hasegawa, D. Reilly, and A. P Bikker Length of consultations BMJ, November 23, 2002; 325(7374): 1241 - 1241. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J Heaney, J. J Walker, J. G. Howie, M. Maxwell, G. K Freeman, P. N. Berrey, T. G Jones, M. C Stern, and S. M Campbell The development of a routine NHS data-based index of performance in general practice (NHSPPI) Fam. Pract., February 1, 2002; 19(1): 77 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S M Campbell, M Hann, J Hacker, C Burns, D Oliver, A Thapar, N Mead, D G. Safran, and M O Roland Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study BMJ, October 6, 2001; 323(7316): 784 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|