Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oppewal, F.
Right arrow Articles by Meyboom-De Jong, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oppewal, F.
Right arrow Articles by Meyboom-De Jong, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 18, No. 3, 304-308
© Oxford University Press 2001

Family members' experiences of autopsy

Feike Oppewal and Betty Meyboom-De Jonga,

dr. H. Brouwerstraat D 7, 9663 RK Nieuwe Pekela and
a Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

Background. The experiences of family members will teach us how to handle an autopsy, the ultimate quality assessment tool.

Objective. The aim of this study was to determine surviving family members' experience of autopsy.

Method. Seven GPs were asked to approach surviving family members of autopsied patients to ask for their co-operation with an interview about their experiences. The interview took place at the residences of the individual families, 6 months to a year after the autopsy. A partially structured set of interview questions was used by the interviewer (not a GP) who had experience with the grieving process and with grief counselling.

Results. Twelve family members of autopsied patients were interviewed: six partners, three mothers, one offspring and two sisters. In the case of one 35-year-old man, the autopsy was performed as a judicially required post-mortem. The GP initiated the autopsy request in eight cases. It appears that there is definite room for improvement in how the GP handles the topic of autopsy. The best way to explain it is to compare an autopsy with an operation. Several family members had specific concerns about the appearance of their relative after the autopsy. Several of the family members indicated that they were reassured by the autopsy results. Clarity about the cause of death was important, and reassurance that they had not overlooked important symptomatology helped the family members in their grieving process.

Conclusion. A request for autopsy is one of the most difficult questions which has to be asked at a very difficult time. Three main considerations were important for the relatives: they wanted an answer to the questions "Is there something I overlooked", "How could this have happened" and "Are there hereditary factors which could have consequences for the rest of the family?" The GP is the optimal professional to discuss the autopsy report with the surviving family members. The best approach for the GP includes an open attitude, paying attention to informing the family and supporting their grieving process.

Keywords. Autopsy, family members, interview, necropsy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. A. Feinstein, L. M. Ernst, J. Ganesh, and C. Feudtner
What New Information Pediatric Autopsies Can Provide: A Retrospective Evaluation of 100 Consecutive Autopsies Using Family-Centered Criteria
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 2007; 161(12): 1190 - 1196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C Snowdon, D R Elbourne, and J Garcia
Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2004; 89(3): F200 - F203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
C. Jaye
Doing qualitative research in general practice: methodological utility and engagement
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2002; 19(5): 557 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.