Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arrelöv, B.
Right arrow Articles by Svärdsudd, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arrelöv, B.
Right arrow Articles by Svärdsudd, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 18, No. 4, 393-398
© Oxford University Press 2001

Do GPs sick-list patients to a lesser extent than other physician categories? A population-based study

Britt Arrelöv, Lars Borgquist, Dan Ljungberg and Kurt Svärdsudd

Uppsala University, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Clinical Epidemiology and Family Medicine Sections, Uppsala Science Park, 751 85 Uppsala and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine and Care, Primary Care, Linköping, Sweden.

Background. Large differences between physicians in their use of the sickness certification instrument have been described. There are also indications of differences between different categories of physicians, for instance that occupational health physicians and GPs are less generous with certificates of long duration.

Objectives. We therefore decided to test the hypothesis that GPs and occupational health physicians issue more short-term certificates and use partial sick-listing more often than other physicians.

Methods. Certificates for sickness absence during 4 months in 1995 and 2 months in 1996 were collected in eight Swedish counties; a total of 57 563 certificates. From the certificates, a number of variables were extracted.

Results. Sickness certificates issued by GPs were on average for a shorter period of time than those issued by other physicians, for the individual certificate as well as for the total sickness period. Occupational health physicians had longer certification periods than GPs but used partial sick-listing more frequently. However, the patients of the various categories of physicians differed regarding age, sex, diagnosis distribution, etc. When the influence of these factors on the duration of the certification periods was taken into account, the GPs still issued significantly shorter periods of sick-leave than the other physicians, followed by the occupational health physicians.

Conclusions. The results may be indicative of a different way of handling the sickness certification instrument among different categories of physicians, especially GPs.

Keywords. Epidemiology, general practice, sick-leave, sick-listing, sickness certification practice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
B. E. Arrelov, L. Borgquist, and K. F. Svardsudd
Influence of local structural factors on physicians' sick-listing practice: a population-based study
Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2005; 15(5): 470 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
E. Soderberg and K. Alexanderson
Sickness certificates as a basis for decisions regarding entitlement to sickness insurance benefits
Scand J Public Health, August 1, 2005; 33(4): 314 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
R. Wahlstrom and K. Alexanderson
Chapter 11. Physicians' sick-listing practices
Scand J Public Health, October 1, 2004; 32(63_suppl): 222 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.