Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rowlands, G
Right arrow Articles by Singleton, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rowlands, G
Right arrow Articles by Singleton, A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 18, No. 4, 399-406
© Oxford University Press 2001

Referrals and relationships: in-practice referrals meetings in a general practice

G Rowlands, S Willis,a and A Singleton

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, St George's Hospital Medical School, 6th Floor, Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE and
a Group Analytic Therapist, Twickenham, Middlesex, UK.

Background. GP referrals to secondary care are an important factor in the cost of running the NHS. The known variation in referral rates between doctors has the potential to cause tension within primary care which will be exacerbated by the latest reorganization of primary care and the trend towards capitation-based budgets. The importance of postgraduate learning for GPs has been recognized; continuing professional development is moving towards self-directed practice-based learning programmes. Educational interventions have been shown to alter doctors' prescribing behaviour. This, together with the pressure on accounting for referral activity, makes the prospect of improving, and possibly reducing, referral activity through educational interventions very attractive.

Objectives. This study complemented a randomized controlled trial (RCT) which investigated whether an intervention of the type which had reduced prescribing costs would have a similar effect on referral activity.

Methods. The context of the study, description of the characteristics of the practice and the issues seen as important by the doctors and practice manager were identified through preliminary semi-structured interviews. The practice then held a series of educational in-practice meetings to discuss referrals and issues arising from referrals. The audio- and videotaped transcripts were interpreted using content and group dynamic analysis. Participants commented upon our preliminary findings. In addition, we used dimensional analysis to induce a preliminary theory describing the effect of the intervention on this general practice which enabled us to review the findings of the parallel RCT. The educational value of the meetings and the learning needs of the participants were also assessed.

Results. Our complementary study showed no alteration of practice referral rates following the educational intervention. The qualitative study, unencumbered by the assumptions inherent in the development of the hypothesis tested in the RCT, highlighted the complexity of decision making in general practice and the likely impact of historical background and a variety of internal and external pressures on this self-directive educational intervention. The practice members described the individual and group learning needs identified as a result of the meetings.

Conclusion. The findings of this study raise important questions for developing practice-based learning. The outcomes of self-directive interventions in practices will be influenced by internal and external events both past and present. Such outcomes may be qualitative and difficult to measure. They are likely to differ from outcomes seen when interventions are applied to groups of doctors who are not all members of the same practice.

Keywords. Changing behaviour, meetings, referrals.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
Y. J. F. M. Jansen, M. M. E. Foets, and A. A. d. Bont
The contribution of qualitative research to the development of tailor-made community-based interventions in primary care: a review
Eur J Public Health, June 26, 2009; (2009) ckp085v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.