Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, C.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morris, C.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 18, No. 4, 454-456
© Oxford University Press 2001

GP survey response rate: a miscellany of influencing factors

CJ Morris, JA Cantrill and MC Weissa,

School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL and
a Division of Primary Healthcare, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK.

Background. GP response to surveys is acknowledged to vary widely. The minimization of non-response bias and the generalizability of findings are fundamental research issues.

Objective. The aim of this study was to identify the factors that had influenced GPs' decisions to complete a questionnaire.

Methods. A short questionnaire eliciting GPs' views on minor ailment consultations was sent to 759 GPs from eight English health authorities. The response rate was 54.5%. Factors perceived by respondents to have influenced their decision to complete this questionnaire were also assessed. Subsequently, a feedback summary, together with a short evaluation form, was sent to those GPs requesting it.

Results. The response from GPs located in the London area was significantly lower than that from those elsewhere. Respondents identified questionnaire length and the originating institution as the two major factors influencing their decision to return the survey. A single mailing of the evaluation form yielded a response rate of >60% predominantly positive comments.

Conclusion. Many factors influence a GP's decision to complete a survey. The effect of location has, to date, largely been ignored. Furthermore, this study suggested feedback to be an important issue. Within health services research, all possible factors need to be considered to maximize response, reduce non-response bias and ultimately facilitate the dissemination of findings.

Keywords. Feedback, GPs, response, survey..


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann Clin BiochemHome page
I. M Barlow
Are biochemistry interpretative comments helpful? Results of a general practitioner and nurse practitioner survey
Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2008; 45(1): 88 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
J. Popay, U. Kowarzik, S. Mallinson, S. Mackian, and J. Barker
Social problems, primary care and pathways to help and support: addressing health inequalities at the individual level. Part I: the GP perspective
J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2007; 61(11): 966 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
K. Fowler, K. Poehling, D. Billheimer, R. Hamilton, H. Wu, J. Mulder, and H. Frangoul
Hospice Referral Practices for Children With Cancer: A Survey of Pediatric Oncologists
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2006; 24(7): 1099 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.