Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sasse, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sasse, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 2, 125-127
© Oxford University Press 2002

Original Paper

How are patients informed about their HIV test results?

Dirk Devroeya,b, Viviane Van Casterena and André Sassea

a Unit of Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, 1050 Brussels and
b Department of General Practice, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

Background. AIDS and HIV are hot topics in public health nowadays, but little information is available about the way in which HIV test results are communicated to patients.

Objective. Our aim was to find out about the way in which patients are informed about their HIV test results and the delay they experience.

Method. Since 1996, a representative network of sentinel GPs has recorded data about requests for HIV tests, risk factors and the way in which and the delay with which patients are informed about their HIV test results.

Results. Between 1996 and 1999, 4807 requests for an HIV test were recorded. Test results were given mostly by phone (41.9%). Patients at risk were informed more often during a planned follow-up. Anxious patients were informed more often about the results by phone, and in 61.2% test results were communicated during the first week following the test. Results were given earlier if patients were anxious or had themselves asked for the test. Although non-consensual HIV testing is against the European guidelines on informed consent, 102 tests (2.2%) were performed without informed consent.

Conclusions. Even though notification by phone decreases the delay, physicians should be encouraged to make follow-up appointments to inform the patient about the test results. A face-to-face conversation is the only way in which physicians can offer valuable post-test counselling. Physicians should be informed about the unlawfulness of non-consensual HIV testing.

Keywords. Family practice, HIV infection, sentinel networks.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
M. Perry and C. Chew-Graham
Finding a vein or obtaining consent: a qualitative study of hepatitis C testing in GP methadone clinics
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2003; 20(5): 538 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.