Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 5, 496-499
© Oxford University Press 2002
Health Services Research |
Continuity in UK general practice: a multilevel model of patient, doctor and practice factors associated with patients seeing their usual doctor
Department of Community Health Sciences-General Practice, MacKenzie Medical Centre, 20 West Richmond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9DX, UK; E-mail: b.guthrie{at}ed.ac.uk
Background. Personal continuity is a ‘core value’ for UK general practice, but often appears ignored by organizational change.
Objectives. The aim of the present study was to examine practice, GP and patient factors associated with personal continuity of care.
Methods. A cross-sectional survey was carried out of 25 994 people aged >15 consulting over a 2-week period in 53 general practices in four regions of the UK. The outcome measure was whether or not the patient was seeing their usual or regular doctor.
Results. Compared with the smallest quintile of practices, the odds ratios [95% confidence interval (CI)] for patients seeing their usual doctor for the two largest quintiles of list size (6337–11 036 and >11 037) were 0.24 (0.12–0.46) and 0.19 (0.10–0.37). Patients in the five practices with personal list systems were more likely to be seeing their usual doctor (odds ratio 3.27, 95% CI 1.87–5.70). Older patients were considerably more likely to be seeing their usual doctor. Young men were less likely, but by middle age there were no differences between men and women. Compared with patients who only wished to discuss a new or urgent physical problem, those wishing to discuss psychological (odds ratio 2.28, 95% CI 2.01–2.58) or longstanding physical problems (odds ratio 1.92, 95% CI 1.78–2.08) were more likely to be seeing their usual doctor.
Conclusions. In this study, list sizes over ~6000–6500 were associated with marked reductions in personal continuity. If GPs are serious about the importance of personal continuity, then the size of the primary care team needs to be examined. There may be potential in separating the administrative functions of the practice from the clinical functions of the primary care team.
Keywords. Continuity of patient care, family practice, professional–patient relationships, quality of health care, UK.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. Touze, F. Saillour-Glenisson, P. Durieux, A. Verdier, S. Leyshon, S. Bendavid, T. Attard, A. Scheimann, J. L. Mas, and J. Coste Lack of validity of a French adaptation of a scale measuring attitudes towards clinical practice guidelines Int. J. Qual. Health Care, June 1, 2006; 18(3): 195 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Stokes, C. Tarrant, A. G. Mainous III, H. Schers, G. Freeman, and R. Baker Continuity of Care: Is the Personal Doctor Still Important? A Survey of General Practitioners and Family Physicians in England and Wales, the United States, and the Netherlands Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2005; 3(4): 353 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. K Freeman, F. Olesen, and P. Hjortdahl Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice? Fam. Pract., December 1, 2003; 20(6): 623 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|