Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Misselbrook, D.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Misselbrook, D.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 5, 566-567
© Oxford University Press 2002

Response

David Misselbrook and David Armstrong

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Response from Misselbrook and Armstrong

Our editorial on communicating risk in the consultation stressed the difficulties of creating meaning (for patients) out of numbers. Now, quite correctly, we have been taken to task for the meaning that . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
J Nexoe, I. Kristiansen, D Gyrd-Hansen, and J. Nielsen
Influence of number needed to treat, costs and outcome on preferences for a preventive drug
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2005; 22(1): 126 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]