Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, S. J
Right arrow Articles by Troein, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, S. J
Right arrow Articles by Troein, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 6, 623-631
© Oxford University Press 2002

What shapes GPs’ work with depressed patients? A qualitative interview study

Stig J Anderssona,b, Gunnar Lindberga and Margareta Troeinb

a The NEPI Foundation, Malmö and
b the Department of Family Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Dr Stig Andersson, Hermes Vårdcentral, Industrigatan 10, SE-661 33 Säffle, Sweden; E-mail: stig.j.andersson{at}swipnet.se

Background. The ways that GPs treat depressed patients have been criticized in a number of studies.

Objective. To explore factors that shape how GPs work with depressed patients.

Methods. Seventeen GPs from the county of Örebro, Sweden participated in a qualitative semi-structured interview study. GPs’ conceptions of factors shaping their way of working with depressed patients, especially continuing medical education (CME), commercial information, inter-collegial support, collaboration with psychiatrists and GPs’ gender were recorded.

Results. Private life experiences as well as professional experiences from family medicine were more often stressed as formative factors than university education and training in psychiatry. Groups of GPs discussisng the doctor–patient relationship set out from real cases (Balint groups) and CME groups were regarded as good forms of education. Most GPs considered company-sponsored lectures valuable. Commercial drug information was seen as more powerful than non-commercial information and GPs wished for more non-commercial information. Collaboration with psychiatry consultants was perceived as insufficient, and GPs felt a need for more inter-collegial support. Traditional female qualities were generally seen as advantageous in the work with depressed patients.

Conclusions. Many GPs consider personal qualities and experiences, including those of gender, to be more influential than academic education and professional literature. This reflects a preference for individual ‘tacit knowledge’. Although tacit knowledge is indispensable in consultations, the low priority given to theoretical CME may make GPs less inclined to make optimal use of different therapeutic alternatives and also less critical of commercial marketing. CME on depression should start with GPs’ individual tacit knowledge and assume a more independent stance from the drug industry.

Keywords. Depressive disorder, general practitioner, interviews.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
C. E Newman, S. C Kippax, L. Mao, G. D Rogers, D. C Saltman, and M. R Kidd
Features of the management of depression in gay men and men with HIV from the perspective of Australian GPs
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2009; 26(1): 27 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
S. Iliffe
Review: screening instruments had sensitivities of 67-100% and specificities of 53-98% for detecting major depression in older primary care patients
Evid. Based Med., July 1, 2004; 9(4): 124 - 124.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.