Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stoddart, H.
Right arrow Articles by Salisbury, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stoddart, H.
Right arrow Articles by Salisbury, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 1, 41-47
© Oxford University Press 2003


Clinical Research

The provision of ‘same-day’ care in general practice: an observational study

Helen Stoddart, Maggie Evans, Tim J Peters and Chris Salisbury

Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, Cotham House, Cotham Hill, Bristol BS6 6JL, UK.

Correspondence to Dr Chris Salisbury; E-mail: c.salisbury{at}bristol.ac.uk

Background. Surveys suggest that general practice is perceived to be inaccessible, with long delays before it is possible to be seen by a doctor. Although there is demand for rapid access to care, this has the potential to decrease continuity of care, which research consistently shows to be valued by patients but stressful for doctors.

Objective. Our aim was to investigate the provision of ‘same-day’ care and the characteristics, treatment expectations and priorities of patients attending for ‘routine’ and ‘same-day’ appointments.

Methods. The uptake of same-day and routine appointments was determined from appointment system records. A self-completed questionnaire survey of people attending 362 same-day and 362 routine appointments at 15 general practices in Avon and Gloucestershire enabled comparisons with respect of patient characteristics and consultation experiences, patients’ preferences for rapid access, seeing a known practitioner or seeing a doctor rather than a nurse.

Results. The uptake per 1000 practice population per day was 7.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.1–8.1] for routine appointments and 3.8 (95% CI 3.5–4.2) for same-day appointments. In univariable analyses, use of same-day care was greater by people who were younger, non-white, in work and with educational qualifications. They had attended the practice less often, waited less time to see a doctor previously, had their current problem for a shorter time and were more likely to expect a prescription. From multivariable analyses, only age, speed of previously obtaining appointments, expecting a prescription and having the problem for a short time were independently associated with receiving same-day care. Rapid access to care was rated as more important than seeing a known doctor for two clinical scenarios.

Conclusions. Much care is provided currently on the day it is requested in general practice. The use of same-day care was related to acute illness and expectations but was not associated with deprivation or patient characteristics apart from age.

Keywords. General practice, same-day care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
N. Pandhi and J. W. Saultz
Patients' perceptions of interpersonal continuity of care.
J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2006; 19(4): 390 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.