Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Medina-Bombardó, D
Right arrow Articles by Llobera, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Medina-Bombardó, D
Right arrow Articles by Llobera, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 2, 103-107
© Oxford University Press 2003


Clinical Research

What is the predictive value of urinary symptoms for diagnosing urinary tract infection in women?

D Medina-Bombardóa, M Seguí-Díazb, C Roca-Fusalbac and J Lloberad the dysuria team

a EAP, Mallorca, IB-Salut,
b EAP, Menorca, IB-Salut,
c EAP, Eivissa-Formentera, IB-Salut and
d Gerència d’Atenció Primària de Mallorca.

Correspondence to David Medina i Bombardó, Unitat d’Investigació de la Gerència d’Atenció Primària de Mallorca, IB-Salut, Carrer de Reina Esclaramunda 9, 07001 Palma, Spain; E-mail: dbombardo{at}terra.es

Objectives. Our aim was to determine the probability of correctly diagnosing urinary tract infections (UTIs) from urinary symptoms and signs, studying their sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio (LR) when clinical history, signs and reactive strip test results are taken into account.

Methods. An epidemiological analysis with a diagnostic and clinical orientation was carried out in a primary health care setting. The subjects comprised 343 women >=14 years of age who consulted their family physician for incident urinary tract symptoms. A guided medical examination was carried out using a check-list formulary, reactive strip test, urine culture and the clinical course of all patients.

Results. The pre-test probability of having UTI among patients with incident urinary symptoms is 0.484 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.431–0.536]. Positive LRs for UTI are: painful voiding 1.31 (95% CI 1.12–1.54), urgency 1.29 (95% CI 1.12–1.50), urinary frequency 1.16 (95% CI 1.06–1.28) and tenesmus 1.16 (95% CI 1.02–1.32). The probability of UTI is reduced by the presence of genital discomfort, dyspareunia, vaginal discharge, positive lumbar fist percussion and perineal discomfort. Nitrites on the urine reactive strip test increase the probability of UTI by >5 times, moderate pyuria increases it by >1.5 times, and the presence of both findings does so by >7 times.

Conclusions. In women with urinary symptoms, a thorough clinical examination, together with performance of a reactive strip test during the office visit, improves the chances of detecting UTI.

Keywords. Diagnostic test, dysuria, likelihood ratio, predictive value, primary health care, urinary tract infection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
L. Leibovici
Trimethoprim reduced dysuria in women with symptoms of urinary tract infection but negative urine dipstick test results
Evid. Based Med., February 1, 2006; 11(1): 19 - 19.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Car
Urinary tract infections in women: diagnosis and management in primary care
BMJ, January 14, 2006; 332(7533): 94 - 97.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
T. Fahey, E. Webb, A. Montgomery, and R. Heyderman
Managing acute cystitis in women
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2004; 21(2): 221 - 222.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.