Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 2, 199-206
© Oxford University Press 2003
Education in Primary Care |
Do clinical practice education groups result in sustained change in GP prescribing?
Department of Public Health and General Practice, Christchurch School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Correspondence to Dr Dee Richards; E-mail: derelie.richards{at}chmeds.ac.nz
Background. Concern has been expressed at the poor uptake of evidence into clinical practice. This is despite the fact that continuing education is an embedded feature of quality assurance in general practice. There are a variety of clinical practice education methods available for dissemination of new evidence. Recent systematic reviews indicate that the effectiveness of these different strategies is extremely variable.
Objective. Our aim was to determine whether a peer-led small group education pilot programme used to promote rational GP prescribing is an effective tool in changing practice when added to prescribing audit and feedback, academic detailing and educational bulletins, and to determine whether any effect seen decays over time.
Methods. A retrospective analysis of a controlled trial of a small group education strategy with 24 month follow-up was carried out. The setting was an independent GPs association (IPA) of 230 GPs in the Christchurch New Zealand urban area. All intervention and control group GPs were already receiving prescribing audit and feedback, academic detailing and educational bulletins. The intervention group were the first 52 GPs to respond to an invitation to pilot the project. Two control groups were used, one group who joined the pilot later and a second group which included all other GPs in the IPA. The main outcome measures were targeted prescribing data for 12 months before and 24 months after each of four education sessions.
Results. An effect in the expected direction was seen in six of the eight key messages studied. This effect was statistically significant for five of the eight messages studied. The effect size varied between 7 and 40%. Where a positive effect was seen, the effect decayed with time but persisted to a significant level for 6–24 months of observation.
Conclusion. The results support a positive effect of the education strategy on prescribing behaviour in the intervention group for most outcomes measured. The effect seen is statistically significant, sustained and is in addition to any effect of the other pharmaceutical educational initiatives already undertaken by the IPA.
Keywords. Behaviour change, education, general practice, prescribing.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F May, D Simpson, L Hart, D Rowett, and D Perrier Experience with academic detailing services for quality improvement in primary care practice Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2009; 18(3): 225 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Figueiras, M. T. Herdeiro, J. Polonia, and J. J. Gestal-Otero An educational intervention to improve physician reporting of adverse drug reactions: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. JAMA, September 6, 2006; 296(9): 1086 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. P Herbert, J. M Wright, M. Maclure, J. Wakefield, C. Dormuth, P. Brett-MacLean, J. Legare, and J. Premi Better Prescribing Project: a randomized controlled trial of the impact of case-based educational modules and personal prescribing feedback on prescribing for hypertension in primary care Fam. Pract., October 1, 2004; 21(5): 575 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|