Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Car, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vegnuti, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Car, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vegnuti, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 20, No. 4, 452-456
© Oxford University Press 2003

International Health Care Research

Management of lower urinary tract infection in women by Slovene GPs

Josip Car, Igor Svab, Janko Kersnika and Miljana Vegnuti

Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia, Trubarjeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana and
a Zdravstvena postaja, Koroska 2, 4280 Kranjska Gora, Slovenia.

Correspondence to Professor Igor Svab; E-mail: Igor.Svab{at}ivz-rs.si

Background. Uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection (LUTI) is one of the most common infections treated in general practice. Although nationwide treatment guidelines for LUTI are increasingly available, most European countries, including Slovenia, have not yet set such guidelines.

Objectives. Our aim was to describe Slovene GPs’ management of uncomplicated LUTIs and to analyse doctor and surgery characteristics that influence this management.

Method. A written case vignette accompanied by open-ended questions regarding doctors’ decisions (i.e. investigations and laboratory tests ordered, treatment options, advising sick leave, advice for treatment and follow-up procedures) and questions about doctor and surgery characteristics was sent to a representative sample of Slovene GPs.

Results. The response rate was 129/171 (75.4%). There were large variations in management of LUTI: 17.8% of GPs ordered various additional laboratory tests; 57% of GPs prescribed trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and 37% norfloxacin; 30% of GPs prescribed a drug for 10–14 days; and 53.5% of GPs put the patient on sick leave of 1–10 days duration. Doctors with heavier workloads and those who have to wait for laboratory results for >24 h ordered more additional investigations.

Conclusions. Effective strategies for quality improvement are needed, together with practice guidelines. The influence of a heavier workload on management of LUTI and the impact of the accessibility of laboratory tests should be explored in future research.

Keywords. Decision making, family practice, process assessment (health care), task performance and analysis, urinary tract infections.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.