Family Practice Vol. 21, No. 1, 11-17
© Oxford University Press 2004, all rights reserved.
Article |
Integration of the recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
Obstacles perceived by a group of family physicians
a Department of Family Medicine, University of Montreal, b Family Medicine Research Team, Cité de la Santé de Laval, c Evaluative Research Unit, CHUM Research Center, University of Montrea, and d Research Center, Charles Lemoyne Hospital, Montreal, Canada
Correspondence to Eveline Hudon, Équipe de recherche en soins de première ligne, Cité de la Santé de Laval, 1755, boulevard René Laennec, Laval, Québec H7M 3L9, Canada; E-mail: ferdais.hudon{at}sympatico.ca
Background. Surveys conducted in North America and in several European countries show that the preventive activities recommended by some groups of experts are difficult to integrate into medical practice. Interventions to correct this problem have produced mitigated results.
Objectives. Our aim was to gain a better understanding of the obstacles perceived by a group of family physicians concerning the integration of prevention into their routine practices.
Methods. A qualitative design was selected to facilitate the exploration of that topic. Seven focus groups with 35 physicians practising in the Montreal area were conducted. Questions regarding their perception of, and obstacles to, the integration of prevention in their daily work were explored. The text of these interviews was analysed following the content analysis method. Codification of the important themes that were identified was done by two of the researchers.
Results. We met with 35 family physicians in two regions in Montreal, Quebec. The lack of motivation on the part of users and the lack of value placed on continuity of care appear to be the main obstacles in the eyes of the physicians, followed by a lack of financial incentives, work overload, and contradictions among the recommendations. In addition, other obstacles were observed by the researchers: limited intervention strategies on the part of physicians to support behaviour modification among patients, non-recognition of the importance of the organization of practice and inability to acknowledge the obstacles that can be ascribed to their own beliefs.
Conclusion. The family physicians we met identified several barriers to the integration of prevention in their practices. The interventions proposed to date do not address the barriers perceived by the physicians in our study. Continuing medical education activities focus on knowledge, while the difficulties expressed relate more to communication skills coupled with a feeling of powerlessness. The physicians we met with do not seem to consider recall systems and looking at their organization of practice as possible solutions. The physicians seem to ‘cave in’ under the weight of the responsibilities that have been assigned to them in terms of health promotion. There may be room for proposing a more realistic menu. This study identifies a need for much more specific and concrete training on communication and counselling skills.
Keywords. Focus groups, obstacles to prevention, periodic health examination, preventive care, prevention implementation.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. McKenna, A. F. Ludwig, and A. F. Ludwig Osteoporotic Caucasian and South Asian women: a qualitative study of general practitioners' support The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, September 1, 2008; 128(5): 263 - 270. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Sinclair, B. Lawson, and F. Burge Which patients receive on diet and exercise?: Do certain characteristics affect whether they receive such advice? Can Fam Physician, March 1, 2008; 54(3): 404 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|