Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 21, No. 2, 137-139
Family Practice Vol. 21, No. 2 © Oxford University Press 2004, all rights reserved.


Article

Abusive behaviour experienced by primary care receptionists: a cross-sectional survey

Catherine AJ Dixon, Charlotte NE Tompkinsa,, Victoria L Allgarb and Nat MJ Wrighta

Stockwell Road Surgery, Knaresborough, a NFA Health Centre for Homeless People and b Centre for Research in Primary Care, Leeds, UK

Correspondence to CNE Tompkins, NFA Health Centre for Homeless People, Leeds, UK; E-mail: c.tompkins{at}leeds.ac.uk

Background. Receptionists act as gatekeepers to GPs, and thus are often placed in situations of conflict. However, there is a lack of research in this area.

Objective. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence and associations of verbal and physical abuse against primary care receptionists, both pre- and post-‘zero tolerance’.

Methods. A postal questionnaire was designed, piloted and sent to all reception staff in 50 randomly selected general practices in Leeds. The primary purpose was to identify any verbal or physical abuse experienced in the 12 months prior to the survey and assess the association between abuse experienced and deprivation.

Results. Seventy percent of receptionists completed and returned the questionnaire. Over two-thirds of receptionists had experienced verbal abuse in the last year. During the same time period, 60% reported telephone abuse and 55% reported face to face abuse. The incidence of abuse was higher in the year prior to the study than in the preceding period. Practice deprivation was identified as a significant factor for verbal abuse (P = 0.003).

Conclusion. Verbal abuse against receptionists is significantly associated with the level of deprivation of the practice area. There is no evidence that ‘zero tolerance’ led to a reduction in abuse experienced by primary care receptionists. All primary care receptionists should receive adequate training on managing abuse.

Keywords. Abuse, deprivation, medical receptionists, primary care, zero tolerance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
P. A. Bayman and T. Hussain
Receptionists' perceptions of violence in general practice
Occup. Med., October 1, 2007; 57(7): 492 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
C. A Sprigg, C. J Armitage, and K. Hollis
Verbal abuse in the National Health Service: impressions of the prevalence, perceived reasons for and relationships with staff psychological well-being
Emerg. Med. J., April 1, 2007; 24(4): 281 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.