Skip Navigation

Family Practice 2004 21(5):519-527; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmh508
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Mandhari, A. S
Right arrow Articles by Haran, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Mandhari, A. S
Right arrow Articles by Haran, D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 21, No. 5 © Oxford University Press 2004, all rights reserved.

Association between perceived health status and satisfaction with quality of care: evidence from users of primary health care in Oman

Ahmed S Al-Mandharia, Amir A Hassanb and D Haranb

a Family and Community Health Department, Muscat, Oman and b Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK

Correspondence to Ahmed S Al-Mandhari, PO Box 857, Ibri P.C. 511, Sultanate of Oman; E-mail: manar96{at}yahoo.com

Objective. Our aim was to assess the influence of perceived health status, as measured by SF-12, on the client's views of service quality.

Methods. A structured interview of patients was carried out in six primary health care centres in Adh Dhahira region health authority in the Sultanate of Oman. A total of 1226 patients aged 15 and over attending the different health care services within the health centres took part in the study. The main outcome measures were patients' satisfaction with the different aspects of health care and their perceived physical and mental health status.

Results. When adjusted for the relevant background factors such as age and gender, poor perceived health status has been found to predict less positive judgements of various aspects of health care quality. Poor mental health status, for example, predicts less positive judgements of aspects that are linked to the accessibility of the service and interpersonal aspects of care such as the working hours of the centre, GP's attitude and time spent with the GP (P < 0.05, <0.05 and <0.01, respectively). Poor physical health status, on the other hand, predicts less positive judgements of aspects such as cleanliness of the building, confidentiality of consultation with the GP, explanation about the visit to the antenatal clinic and standard of antenatal clinic in general (P < 0.05, <0.05, <0.05 and <0.05, respectively).

Conclusion. Users' perceived health status has to be evaluated concurrently with assessing satisfaction with the quality of health care services. This would provide more valid results with regard to the patients' views on their level of satisfaction with health care quality.

Keywords. Oman, patient satisfaction, perceived health status, primary care, quality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
A. J. Mitchell, D. Malone, and C. C. Doebbeling
Quality of medical care for people with and without comorbid mental illness and substance misuse: systematic review of comparative studies
The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2009; 194(6): 491 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
Y. Zhang, J. Rohrer, T. Borders, and T. Farrell
Patient Satisfaction, Self-Rated Health Status, and Health Confidence: An Assessment of the Utility of Single-Item Questions
American Journal of Medical Quality, January 1, 2007; 22(1): 42 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.