Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on November 4, 2004
Family Practice 2005 22(1):109-113; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmh601
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/109    most recent
cmh601v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, M. S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Engberg, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, M. S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Engberg, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

Electrocardiogram interpretation in general practice

Morten Sig Ager Jensena, Janus Laust Thomsena, Svend Eggert Jensenc, Torsten Lauritzenb and Marianne Engbergb

a Department and Research Unit of General Practice, and b Department of General Practice, University of Aarhus and c Department of Cardiology, Skejby University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark

Email: mj{at}alm.au.dk

Background. The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is a common diagnostic test available to the GP in the evaluation of patients with cardiac complaints. In daily clinical practice it is important for GPs to know the sensitivity and specificity of their ECG interpretation skills.

Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the ECG interpretation skills of GPs and the value of automatic ECG recorder interpretations in general practice.

Methods. A total of 902 ECGs were recorded in a random sample of the population aged 31–51 years in the district of Ebeltoft, Denmark, from December 1991 to June 1992. They were interpreted automatically by an interpretive ECG recorder and by the GPs in the clinic in Ebeltoft, with a cardiologists interpretation as a gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of diagnoses were calculated.

Results. Overall, the sensitivity of abnormal diagnoses made by the GPs (69.8%) was significantly lower (P < 0.001) than that of diagnoses made by the interpretive ECG recorder (84.4%). The overall specificity of abnormal diagnoses made by the GP (85.7%) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than that achieved by the interpretive ECG recorder (75.6%).

Conclusions. GPs in this study were good at correcting false-positive diagnoses made by the interpretive ECG recorder. In order to avoid unfortunate reclassifications of true-positive to false-negative diagnoses, GPs are recommended to pay special attention to the diagnoses of ST-segment deviation, T-wave inversion or the presence of Q-waves made by interpretive ECG recorders, when ECGs are used in individual risk assessment.

Keywords. Cardiology, clinical diagnosis, predictive value of tests, primary health care, sensitivity and specificity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.