Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on April 11, 2005
Family Practice 2005 22(3):275-279; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/3/275    most recent
cmi031v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mc Loughlin, M
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mc Loughlin, M
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

A comparative study on attitudes, mental health and job stress amongst GPs participating, or not, in a rural out-of-hours co-operative

M Mc Loughlina, P Armstrongb, M Byrnea, D Heaneyc, N O'Briena and AW Murphya

a Department of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, b Health Centre, Lifford, County Donegal, Ireland and c Highlands and Islands Health Research Institute, University of Aberdeen, Inverness IV2 3ED UK

Correspondence to Andrew W Murphy; E-mail: andrew.murphy{at}nuigalway.ie

Objectives. To test the study hypothesis that GPs participating in co-operatives will have more positive attitudes towards co-operatives, better mental health and less stress than GPs using traditional out-of-hours arrangements.

Methods. A comparative questionnaire study was conducted amongst GPs, participating, or not, in an out-of-hours, largely rural, co-operative (‘NoWDOC’) which had been established one year previously. The general attitudes of GPs towards out-of-hours work were obtained together with responses to the General Health Questionnaire-12 (mental health) and Stress Arousal Checklist (job stress).

Results. Eighty-nine of 120 eligible practitioners responded (74%). The mean GHQ scores for GPs in NoWDOC was 10.2 [standard deviation (SD) 3.9] compared to a score of 11.3 (SD 4.5) for those not participating (t = –1.18; P = 0.24). The overall mean stress score for members of NoWDOC was 3.8 (SD 2.6) compared to 3.4 (SD 2.7) for non-NoWDOC (t = 0.59; P = 0.55). The overall mean arousal score for NoWDOC GPs was 5.2 (SD 2.0) compared to 5.5 (SD 2.9) for non-NoWDOC GPs (t = –0.68; P = 0.50). Multiple regression analyses suggested that the independent variables (partnership arrangements, age, working hours and membership of NoWDOC) did not account for any of the variability in the GHQ score but a significant amount of variability in stress and arousal scores.

Conclusions. The anticipated differences in mental health and job stress among participating GPs were not shown. As the new generation of GPs resemble the NoWDOC participants in their preferences for multi-partner practices with limited out-of-hours care provision, clarification of these findings is important.

Keywords. Out-of-hours, co-operatives, rural, stress.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intellect DisabilHome page
S. J. Noone and R. P. Hastings
Building psychological resilience in support staff caring for people with intellectual disabilities: Pilot evaluation of an acceptance-based intervention
J Intellect Disabil., March 1, 2009; 13(1): 43 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.