Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on February 3, 2006
Family Practice 2006 23(3):353-362; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi116
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obstacles to Shared Care for Patients with Dementia: A qualitative study
Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Department of Primary Care & Population Sciences, Royal Free & UCL Medical School UK
Correspondence to Dr Steve Iliffe, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Department of Primary Care & Population Sciences, RFUCLMS, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK; Email s.iliffe{at}pcps.ucl.ac.uk
Background. All Primary Care Trusts in England were meant to have shared care protocols for antidementia medication use in place by 1 April 2004. Shared care of medical treatment in dementia depends upon early diagnosis, but under-recognition of and under-response to dementia appear widespread in general practice.
Aim. To investigate the perceptions of specialists and generalists about the potential for shared care of people with dementia.
Design of study. Qualitative study with semistructured interviews.
Setting. Three inner-city and two rural areas.
Methods. Semistructured interviews were arranged at the participants' convenience and were tape-recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis of the anonymized transcripts was undertaken and a case and cross-case analysis was performed.
Results. Thirty-nine GPs and 30 specialists were interviewed. Broad themes were reduced to following four key categories which appear to be layered over each other: therapeutic nihilism; risk reduction or avoidance; concerns about competency; and resources for shared care.
Conclusion. Roles for primary and secondary care professionals are inappropriately distributed and require clearer definition. Resistance to shared care mostly comes from within general practice and reflects concerns about staffing, time constraints, lack of experience and confidence in making and disclosing a diagnosis. Developers of shared care protocols must dissect layered obstacles, addressing the issues of therapeutic nihilism, risk management and clinical competence.
Keywords. Dementia, primary care, qualitative research, shared care.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Crowe, M. P Tully, and J. A Cantrill The prescribing of specialist medicines: what factors influence GPs' decision making? Fam. Pract., August 1, 2009; 26(4): 301 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Brayne, C. Fox, and M. Boustani Dementia Screening in Primary Care: Is It Time? JAMA, November 28, 2007; 298(20): 2409 - 2411. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. F. Schryer, O. Gladkova, M. M. Spafford, and L. Lingard Co-management in healthcare: negotiating professional boundaries Discourse & Communication, November 1, 2007; 1(4): 452 - 479. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Iliffe, J. Wilcock, and D. Haworth Delivering psychosocial interventions for people with dementia in primary care: Jobs or skills? Dementia, August 1, 2006; 5(3): 327 - 338. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Downs, S. M.B. Ariss, E. Grant, J. Keady, S. Turner, M. Bryans, J. Wilcock, E. Levin, R. O'carroll, and S. Iliffe Family carers' accounts of general practice contacts for their relatives with early signs of dementia Dementia, August 1, 2006; 5(3): 353 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|