Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on October 24, 2006
Family Practice 2006 23(6):687-692; doi:10.1093/fampra/cml050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/6/687    most recent
cml050v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hungin, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hungin, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The diagnosis of IBS in primary care: consensus development using nominal group technique

Greg Rubina, Niek De Witb, Villy Meineche-Schmidtc, Bohumil Seifertd, Nicola Halla and Pali Hungine

a Centre for Primary and Community Care, University of Sunderland Sunderland, UK
b Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University of Utrecht Utrecht, Netherlands
c Copenhagen Denmark
d Department of General Practice, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic
e Centre for Integrated Health Care Research, University of Durham Durham, UK

Correspondence to: Greg Rubin, Professor of Primary Care, Centre for Primary and Community Care, University of Sunderland, Priestman Building, Green Terrace, Sunderland SR1 3PZ, UK. Email: greg.rubin{at}sunderland.ac.uk

Background. The criteria used to identify and diagnose irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in primary care are unclear, even though most patients are managed entirely in this setting.

Objective. To use a validated method of consensus development [Nominal Group Technique (Rand version)] (NGT-R) in order to construct a diagnostic framework for IBS appropriate to primary care.

Methods. NGT-R is a formal method of consensus development, which uses structured interaction within a group combined with statistical derivation of group judgements. The group comprised 10 GPs with a special interest in gastroenterology and two gastroenterologists, from 10 European countries. Mailed questionnaires elicited judgements on 242 scenarios for the diagnosis of IBS, within four domains of symptoms, social and lifestyle features, psychological features and investigations. Feedback of group decisions was followed by structured face-to-face interaction and private rescoring of the questionnaire. Consensus was defined as 10/12 ratings within one of three bands, 1–3 (disagreement), 4–6 (equivocal) or 7–9 (agreement).

Results. The defining features of IBS in primary care are alteration in bowel habit, bloating and abdominal pain, or discomfort or annoyance (the last reflecting important cultural differences in symptom description). These symptoms need to be present for at least 4 weeks. Supportive characteristics include female sex, family history of IBS, frequent clinic attendances, a recent major life event and a history of somatization behaviours. Abdominal examination was considered necessary in all patients and rectal examination, haemoglobin estimation and colonoscopy in those aged >55 years. The subtypes of IBS are recognized, but the diagnostic process differs only in minor ways. Final consensus was reached on 46% of statements.

Conclusion. The basis of IBS diagnosis in primary care differs from, and is less exclusive than, existing criteria. Few features are deemed essential for diagnosis, while psychosocial features, patient characteristics and contextual factors are important in increasing diagnostic probability. There are important cultural differences in the description of key symptoms. These results provide information on the defining characteristics of IBS and the diagnostic process, as it occurs in primary care, and can guide clinical practice.

Keywords. Irritable bowel syndrome, diagnosis, primary care, nominal group technique.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
R. E Casiday, A P S Hungin, C. S Cornford, N. J de Wit, and M. T Blell
Patients' explanatory models for irritable bowel syndrome: symptoms and treatment more important than explaining aetiology
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2009; 26(1): 40 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
R. E Casiday, A. Hungin, C. S Cornford, N. J de Wit, and M. T Blell
GPs' explanatory models for irritable bowel syndrome: a mismatch with patient models?
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2009; 26(1): 34 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. C. Ford, N. J. Talley, S. J. O. Veldhuyzen van Zanten, N. B. Vakil, D. L. Simel, and P. Moayyedi
Will the History and Physical Examination Help Establish That Irritable Bowel Syndrome Is Causing This Patient's Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Symptoms?
JAMA, October 15, 2008; 300(15): 1793 - 1805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.