Skip Navigation

Family Practice 2008 25(2):69-70; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn026
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graffy, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graffy, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Editorial

Engaging family practitioners in research: are we getting it right?

Jonathan Graffy

General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK

Email: jonathan.graffy@phpc.cam.ac.uk

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The argument that health care for everyday conditions should be based on research conducted in primary care is widely accepted. To achieve this, governments in various countries have sought to develop academic family practice and support community-based research. These include initiatives to develop new researchers, as well as to encourage service practitioners to take part in studies initiated by academics or the pharmaceutical industry. In Australia, the Primary Health . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Declaration


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?