Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on November 24, 2008
Family Practice 2009 26(1):3-9; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn084
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/1/3    most recent
cmn084v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gingter, C.
Right arrow Articles by Abholz, H.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gingter, C.
Right arrow Articles by Abholz, H.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Is COPD a rare disease? Prevalence and identification rates in smokers aged 40 years and over within general practice in Germany

Christian Gingtera, Stefan Wilmb and Heinz-Harald Abholza

a Department of General Practice, Universitätsklinikum, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf
b Department of General Practice, University Witten/Herdecke, D-58448 Witten, Germany

Correspondence to Heinz-Harald Abholz, Department of General Practice, Universitätsklinikum, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; Email: abholz{at}med.uni-duesseldorf.de

Received 11 March 2008; Accepted 8 October 2008.


   Abstract

Background. According to literature, COPD rates are high in spite of decreasing rates of main risk factors smoking and air pollution in developed countries. general practice is a good place to survey unbiased prevalence rates. Ten studies done in general practice over the last 20 years found prevalence rates among smokers between 13.1% and 92.1%.

Objective. Prevalence and detection rates of COPD in smokers in German general practice.

Methods. Twenty-eight of 34 invited and eligible GP surgeries in/around Duesseldorf, Germany, took part in the non-announced 2-day investigation of all smokers (≥40 years) who visited the surgeries. Lung function test by hand-held spirometer, peak flow, sympton part of St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, and data on smoking habits were used. GOLD criteria for COPD were employed. GPs had to give their diagnosis not knowing the test results.

Results. Of 3157 patients attending the 28 surgeries, 538 were smokers. Four hundred and thirty-seven of these agreed to participate, 5 had to be excluded for medical reasons/unacceptable spirometry. Three hundred and ninety-eight patients have not been previously diagnosed with COPD or asthma. Thirty patients were disgnosed with COPD, making a prevalence of 6.9%, of which 15 patients were already known as having COPD.

Conclusion. Our result of low prevalence differs strongly from all other studies in general practice. Considering our study design which avoids selection bias found in nearly all other studies (no pre-announcement, no self-selection of patients or GPs, high participation rate and testing all patients), we strongly believe that our findings reflect the current situation of COPD in German general practice.

Keywords. COPD, detection rate, general practice, prevalence, smoking, spirometry.


Gingter C, Wilm S and Abholz HH. Is COPD a rare disease? Prevalence and identification rates in smokers aged 40 years and over within general practice in Germany. Family Practice 2009; 26: 3–9.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.