Skip Navigation


Family Practice Advance Access originally published online on March 6, 2009
Family Practice 2009 26(3):174-179; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmp018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/3/174    most recent
cmp018v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krul, M.
Right arrow Articles by Koes, B. W
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krul, M.
Right arrow Articles by Koes, B. W
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Foot problems in children presented to the family physician: a comparison between 1987 and 2001

Marjolein Krula, Johannes C van der Woudena, François G Schellevisb, Lisette WA van Suijlekom-Smitc and Bart W Koesa

a Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Room Ff304, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam
b Department of General practice/EMGO Institute VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam/NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research Utrecht, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht
c Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC/Sophia Children's Hospital Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to Marjolein Krul, Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Room Ff304, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Email: m.krul{at}erasmusmc.nl

Received 14 May 2008; Revised 29 January 2009; Accepted 6 February 2009.


   Abstract

Background. In recent decades, studies on the management of common foot problems in children have suggested that in many cases, there is no indication for treatment. It is not known whether these studies have changed daily practice.

Objective. Our aim was to establish and compare incidence and referral rates for foot problems in children in 1987 and 2001.

Methods. A comparison was made of two large consecutive surveys in Dutch general practice performed in 1987 (86 577 children aged 0–17 years) and 2001 (87 952 children aged 0–17 years), which were carried out by The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research. Both surveys included a representative sample of the Dutch population. Incidence and referral rates were calculated and, data were stratified for age group and gender.

Results. Compared to 1987, in 2001 the overall incidence rate of foot problems presented to the family physician (FP) decreased substantially from 80.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 77.0–84.7] to 17.4 (95% CI 16.5–18.3) per 1000 person-years (P < 0.0001). The incidence rate of flat feet decreased from 4.9 (95% CI 4.0–5.9) per 1000 person-years in 1987 to 3.4 (95% CI 3.0–3.8) per 1000 person-years in 2001 (P = 0.001). The distribution of referrals to other primary health care professionals and medical specialists has almost reversed in favour of primary health care professionals.

Conclusion. Total incidence rate of musculoskeletal foot problems seen by the FP has decreased substantially, between 1987 and 2001.

Keywords. Children, family physician, foot, musculoskeletal, incidence.


Krul M, van der Wouden JC, Schellevis FG, van Suijlekom-Smit LWA and Koes BW. Foot problems in children presented to the family physician. Family Practice 2009; 26: 174–179.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.