Family Practice Advance Access published online on November 4, 2004
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmh623
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Health Care Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Southampton and Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Objective. A study was undertaken to investigate patients' strength of preferences for attributes or characteristics associated with delivery of emergency primary care services available during usual GP surgery hours and to investigate the trade-offs between attributes. Methods. A discrete choice experiment was used to quantify patients' strength of preferences for several key attributes of usual-hours emergency primary care. The attributes were chosen to reflect the findings of previous research, current policy initiatives and discussions with local key stakeholders. A self-complete questionnaire was administered to NHS Direct callers and adult attenders at Accident and Emergency, GP services and the NHS Walk-in Centre in the locality. Regression analysis was used to estimate the relative importance to patients of the different attributes. Results. An overall response of 71% (n = 432) was achieved. All but one of the attributes was a statistically significant predictor of preference. The attribute ‘being kept informed about waiting time’ was the most important. This was followed by ‘quality of the consultation’, ‘having a consultation with a nurse’, ‘having a consultation with a doctor’ and ‘contacting the service in person’. Respondents were prepared to wait an extra 68 min to have a consultation with a doctor, but an extra 2 h 9 min for information about expected waiting time. There were no measurable preference differences between patients surveyed at different NHS entry points. Respondents younger than 45 years held strong preferences with respect to how they wanted to make contact with the system, whereas older respondents appeared not to hold strong preferences, seemingly indifferent between the alternatives. There was weak evidence which showed the younger group more strongly preferred accessing services via an integrated telephone system than making contact in person. Conclusions. This study showed that local solutions for reforming emergency primary care during hours when the GP surgery is open should take account of the strength of patient preferences. The discrete choice method was acceptable, and the results directly informed the development of a local service framework for such care.
Accepted July 22, 2004
Article
Preferences of patients for emergency services available during usual GP surgery hours: a discrete choice experiment
2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, UK
Karen Gerard, E-mail: kareng{at}soton.ac.uk
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. J Mangham, K. Hanson, and B. McPake How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country Health Policy Plan., March 1, 2009; 24(2): 151 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. O'Cathain, P. Coleman, and J. Nicholl Characteristics of the emergency and urgent care system important to patients: a qualitative study J Health Serv Res Policy, April 1, 2008; 13(suppl_2): 19 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Cheraghi-Sohi, A. R. Hole, N. Mead, R. McDonald, D. Whalley, P. Bower, and M. Roland What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients' Priorities Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2008; 6(2): 107 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Cheraghi-Sohi, P. Bower, N. Mead, R. McDonald, D. Whalley, and M. Roland Making sense of patient priorities: applying discrete choice methods in primary care using 'think aloud' technique Fam. Pract., June 1, 2007; 24(3): 276 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|