Family Practice Advance Access published online on January 7, 2005
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmh704
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Community Health Sciences--General Practice, St George's Hospital Medical School, 6th Floor, Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Background. The Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) is recognised as the ‘gold standard’ in quantitative research. However RCTs testing health care interventions can be difficult to design and implement. Health care interventions are often complex in themselves and are always applied in complex settings. Such interventions require a process of careful ‘modelling’ to maximize the chances of successful trials that will add to knowledge. Objectives. To describe the terms ‘complex’ and ‘modelling’ as used in the setting of randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. To give a practical example of an RCT involving a complex intervention applied in a health care setting to illustrate how this might take place in practice. Methods. We describe an RCT designed and conducted by the authors. We then use our trial as an example to illustrate how complex interventions such as ours might benefit from modelling during the design of the intervention and the setting within which the intervention is to be tested. Results. Our project was designed and tested before current guidance on complex interventions was published; our RCT was therefore not ‘modelled’ but was based on the outcome of a single quantitative pilot study. As part of our study we ran a parallel qualitative study, which highlighted several areas of complexity both in our intervention, and in the setting within which we applied it. In this paper we show how modelling might have allowed us to recognise these complexities at an early stage and might therefore have resulted in a study more likely to have demonstrated useful outcomes. Conclusion. Careful modelling of complex interventions is an essential step in designing trials of innovations in health care and health care services. Such a process ensures that interventions fit with and reflect the complexities of the settings within which interventions will be applied, and should ensure that the outcomes chosen are those most appropriate to demonstrate any benefits or risks.
Received July 21, 2004
Accepted August 4, 2004
Article
A lesson learnt: the importance of modelling in randomized controlled trials for complex interventions in primary care
2 Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, 200 Berkeley Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
Gill Rowlands, E-mail: growland{at}sghms.ac.uk
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. J. F. M. Jansen, M. M. E. Foets, and A. A. d. Bont The contribution of qualitative research to the development of tailor-made community-based interventions in primary care: a review Eur J Public Health, June 26, 2009; (2009) ckp085v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Murchie, P. C Hannaford, S. Wyke, M. C Nicolson, and N. C Campbell Designing an integrated follow-up programme for people treated for cutaneous malignant melanoma: a practical application of the MRC framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health Fam. Pract., June 1, 2007; 24(3): 283 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
E-letters:
Read all E-letters
- Modelling complex interventions: be wary of time required
- Andrew W Murphy, et al.
- Family Practice, 19 Apr 2005 [Full text]