Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on January 7, 2005
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmh706
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/126    most recent
cmh706v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nexøe, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nexøe, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.
Received January 7, 2004
Accepted March 16, 2004

Article

Influence of number needed to treat, costs and outcome on preferences for a preventive drug

J. Nexøe 1*, I. S. Kristiansen 1, D. Gyrd-Hansen 1, and J. B. Nielsen 1

1 University of Southern Denmark, Research Unit of General Practice, Winsløwparken 19, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Nexøe, E-mail: jnexoe{at}health.sdu.dk


  Abstract

Background. The number needed to treat (NNT) has been widely recommended for communicating benefits from risk reductions. It has been claimed that NNT is easily understood and that it has intuitive meaning. There are, however, only few studies of lay people's understanding of NNT.

Objective. The objective of this study was to explore whether lay people are sensitive to the magnitude of treatment effectiveness as expressed in terms of NNT, and whether the sensitivity is influenced by variation in the type of health outcome, variation in patients' payment for the treatment or variation in the type of side effects.

Methods. In total, 2326 non-institutionalized Danes aged 18-91 years were interviewed face to face and asked whether they would consent to a treatment against a somewhat increased risk of death or heart attack. The respondents were allocated to different levels of effectiveness of treatment expressed as NNT of 10, 100, 200 or 400, different costs and different descriptions of adverse effects.

Results. The odds for consenting to therapy were little influenced by the magnitude of NNT, but were greater among married respondents and among those who had side effects presented in terms of headache and constipation.

Conclusion. In this study, the respondents' choice of treatment was largely insensitive to the magnitude of NNT independently of variations in type of health outcome and costs. NNT may not be easily understood by lay people.

Keywords: General practice; number needed to treat; outcome type; randomized trial; risk communication.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. A. Halvorsen, R. Selmer, and I. S. Kristiansen
Different Ways to Describe the Benefits of Risk-Reducing Treatments: A Randomized Trial
Ann Intern Med, June 19, 2007; 146(12): 848 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
P. A. Halvorsen and I. S. Kristiansen
Decisions on Drug Therapies by Numbers Needed to Treat: A Randomized Trial
Arch Intern Med, May 23, 2005; 165(10): 1140 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.