Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on January 7, 2005
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmh718
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/86    most recent
cmh718v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oudega, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hoes, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oudega, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hoes, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice © Oxford University Press 2004, all rights reserved.
Received June 16, 2004
Accepted September 27, 2004

Article

Limited value of patient history and physical examination in diagnosing deep vein thrombosis in primary care

Ruud Oudega 1*, Karel G. M. Moons 1, and Arno W. Hoes 1

1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary care, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85060, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ruud Oudega, E-mail: R.Oudega{at}knmg.nl


  Abstract

Background. Properly ruling in or out deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is important because of the risk of developing pulmonary embolism if untreated and the risk of bleeding when treated with anticoagulants. In primary care, the diagnosis in suspected DVT is non-specific and the physician has to decide which patients to refer for further diagnostic work-up on the basis of patient history and physical examination alone.

Objective. To quantify which (combination of) items from patient history and physical examination contribute to the diagnosis of DVT in primary care.

Methods. A cross-sectional study design was chosen and the setting was all primary care physicians adherent to three local hospitals. 1325 consecutive patients consulting their primary care physician with symptoms suggestive of DVT were included.

Results. We studied 1325 patients with suspected DVT. The prevalence of thrombosis (assessed by means of compression ultrasonography) in these patients was 29%. Multivariate regression analysis of 17 candidate predictors resulted in nine independent predictors of DVT: male gender, duration of symptoms, malignancy, immobilization, leg trauma, pain when walking, oedema, calf circumference and dilated veins. The predictive value of the combination of the nine independent variables was low, reflected in the ROC area (as a combination of the sensitivity and specificity) of this model of 0.68. The low discriminative value was also exhibited in the numbers of DVT in the different risk categories. For example, in the low-risk group, the probability of DVT was still 15%. The diagnostic performance of patient history and physical examination was similar (and thus poor) in all clinically relevant subgroups.

Conclusion. Patient history and physical examination in patients suspected of DVT are of limited value for the primary care setting to identify patients with a low or high probability of DVT and thus in the decision to refer for further diagnostic work-up.

Keywords: Diagnosis; patient history; physical examination; primary health care; venous thrombosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
K. J.M. Janssen, Y. Vergouwe, A. R. T. Donders, F. E. Harrell Jr., Q. Chen, D. E. Grobbee, and K. G.M. Moons
Dealing with Missing Predictor Values When Applying Clinical Prediction Models
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2009; 55(5): 994 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
Thromboembolism after pneumonectomy for malignancy: An independent marker of poor outcome.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2006; 131(3): 711 - 718.



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.