Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on January 7, 2005
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmh721
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/15    most recent
cmh721v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schers, H.
Right arrow Articles by van den Bosch, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schers, H.
Right arrow Articles by van den Bosch, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice © Oxford University Press 2004, all rights reserved.
Received June 25, 2004
Accepted July 28, 2004

Article

Familiarity with a GP and patients' evaluations of care. A cross-sectional study

Henk Schers 1*, Henk van den Hoogen 1, Hans Bor 1, Richard Grol 2, and Wil van den Bosch 1

1 Department of General Practice, University Medical Centre St Radboud Nijmegen and University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
2 Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), University Medical Centre St Radboud Nijmegen and University of Maastricht, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Henk Schers, E-mail: H.schers{at}hag.umcn.nl


  Abstract

Background. Personal continuity is considered a core feature of general practice care. Nowadays, another important concept for general practice may be patients' familiarity with a GP.

Objectives. We studied the extent to which patients see a familiar GP, and how this matches their preferences. Furthermore we studied the impact of knowing the GP on patients' evaluations of consultations.

Methods. A cross-sectional design was used and 2400 patients visiting 17 general practices (30 GPs) in The Netherlands for a consultation were approached; 2152 patients completed the questionnaire. The main outcome measures were: i) the extent to which patients saw a familiar GP in relation to the reason for encounter, perceived seriousness of symptoms, and concern about symptoms; and ii) the impact of ‘knowing the GP’ on patients' overall satisfaction with the consultation, feeling of being helped to move forwards, trust in the GP, and perceived clearness of treatment plans.

Results. Patients saw a familiar GP to a high extent, regardless of the reason for encounter, perceived seriousness of symptoms and worries. Higher levels of familiarity with a GP were associated with higher levels of satisfaction, with increased feelings of being helped forward, with more trust in the GP, and with the perception of clearer treatment plans made. A multivariate model including the variable ‘knowing the GP’ explained 11% of the observed variance in patients' evaluations of consultations.

Conclusion. Familiarity with a GP improves patients' assessment of general practice care. Also in the future, personal continuity should be promoted.

Keywords: Continuity of patient care; cross-sectional design.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
K. O'Brien, N. Cadbury, S. Rollnick, and F. Wood
Sickness certification in the general practice consultation: the patients' perspective, a qualitative study
Fam. Pract., February 2, 2008; (2008) cmm076v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
E. Michiels, R. Deschepper, G. Van Der Kelen, J. L. Bernheim, F. Mortier, R. Vander Stichele, and L. Deliens
The role of general practitioners in continuity of care at the end of life: a qualitative study of terminally ill patients and their next of kin
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2007; 21(5): 409 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 DementiaHome page
M. Downs, S. M.B. Ariss, E. Grant, J. Keady, S. Turner, M. Bryans, J. Wilcock, E. Levin, R. O'carroll, and S. Iliffe
Family carers' accounts of general practice contacts for their relatives with early signs of dementia
Dementia, August 1, 2006; 5(3): 353 - 373.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Board Fam MedHome page
N. Pandhi and J. W. Saultz
Patients' perceptions of interpersonal continuity of care.
J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2006; 19(4): 390 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
N. Edwards
Using markets to reform health care
BMJ, December 17, 2005; 331(7530): 1464 - 1466.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.