Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on April 11, 2005
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi010
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/4/399    most recent
cmi010v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kharicha, K.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kharicha, K.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received August 11, 2004
Accepted August 27, 2004

Article

Tearing down the Berlin wall: social workers' perspectives on joint working with general practice

Kalpa Kharicha 1*, Steve Iliffe 1, Enid Levin 2, Barbara Davey 3, and Cass Fleming 4

1 Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London
2 Social Care Institute for Excellence, London
3 Nursing Research Unit, King's College London
4 former National Institute for Social Work

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Kalpa Kharicha, E-mail: k.kharicha{at}pcps.ucl.ac.uk


  Abstract

Background. The arrangements for delivering social work and primary health care to older people in England and Wales are currently subject to rapid re-configuration, with the development of integrated primary care and social services trusts.

Objective. To investigate perceptions of joint working in social services and general practice.

Methods. The study setting was two London boroughs covered by one health authority, one NHS Community Health Services Trust, four Primary Care Groups and two social services departments. All social work team managers in both areas were interviewed together with a purposive sample of social workers with a high number of older clients on their caseloads. A sample of GPs was sought using a sampling frame of practice size in each borough. Structured interviews with open and closed questions were used. Tape-recorded interviews were transcribed and subject to thematic analysis. Analysis of emergent themes was aided by the use of Atlas-ti.

Results. Social workers and GPs agree on the need for joint working, but have different understandings of it, each profession wanting the other to change its organizational culture. Co-location of social and health care is seen as desirable, but threatening to social work. Concerns about differences in power and hierarchical authority are evident and explicit in social work perspectives. Conflict resolution strategies include risk minimization, adopting pragmatic, case-specific solutions rather than remaining consistent with policy, using nurses as mediators, and resorting to authority.

Conclusions. Although this is a study from urban areas in England, its findings may have wider significance since we have found that resources and professional skills may be more important than organizational arrangements in collaborative working between disciplines. Primary Care Trusts in England and Wales should promote awareness of these different perspectives, perceived risks and conflict minimization strategies in their work on clinical governance and professional development.

Keywords: Collaboration; joint working; partnership; social care.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.