Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on May 16, 2005
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi036
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/4/361    most recent
cmi036v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, S. Y. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, S. Y. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received May 26, 2004
Accepted January 29, 2005

Article

Primary care physicians in Hong Kong and Canada--how did their practices differ during the SARS epidemic?

Samuel Yeung Shan Wong 1*, William Wong 1, Liisa Jaakkimainen 2, Susan Bondy 3, Kwong Ka Tsang 4, and Albert Lee 1

1 Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
2 Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3 Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
4 Centre for Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Public Health, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Samuel Yeung Shan Wong, E-mail: yeungshanwong{at}cuhk.edu.hk


  Abstract

Background. Hong Kong and Canada have very different primary health care systems. We thus hypothesized family physicians between the two places would be different in how they protected themselves, their staff and families during the epidemic.

Objective. The purpose of this study was to explore and contrast the impact of SARS on family physicians in Hong Kong and Toronto.

Methods. A postal questionnaire was designed and sent to 183 tutors affiliated with the Chinese University of Hong Kong with 137 replies (74.8%). In Toronto, 150 questionnaires were sent to academic family physicians affiliated with the University of Toronto with 51 replies (34%).

Results. All agreed SARS had changed their clinical behaviour. For public health measures in the control of SARS, Hong Kong physicians were less likely to quarantined themselves (77.1% versus 19.4%, P < 0.01) or gave quarantine leave to staff (95% versus 59.7%, P < 0.01) after exposure to probable or suspected SARS. However, they were more likely to wear a mask (52.7% versus 97.7%, P = 0) during consultation, having support staff to wear masks (68.6% versus 97.8%, P = 0) and test patient's temperature (47.1% versus 68.1%, P < 0.01).

Conclusion. There were noticeable differences in how family physicians deal with SARS between the two cities. As SARS emerged as a global disease, better understanding of practice differences among physicians from different countries would facilitate globalization of public health.

Keywords: Family physicians; Hong Kong; SARS; Toronto.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.