Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on June 17, 2005
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi046
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/5/507    most recent
cmi046v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roche, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzpatrick, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roche, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzpatrick, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received October 28, 2004
Accepted April 21, 2005

Article

Reassurance or judgement? Parents' views on the delivery of child health surveillance programmes

Brenda Roche 1, Sarah Cowley 2, Niki Salt 1, Amy Scammell 1*, Mary Malone 2, Philippa Savile 1, Daphine Aikens 1, and Susan Fitzpatrick 1

1 BRG--Wandsworth Primary Care Research Centre, Wandsworth PCT, Bolingbroke Hospital, Wakehurst Road, London SW11 6HN, UK
2 Florence Nightingale School of Nursing & Midwifery, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 64 Waterloo Road, London SE1, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Amy Scammell, E-mail: amy{at}brg123.net


  Abstract

Background. The first year of a child's life is a crucial time for child development. Current guidance about child health surveillance and health promotion programmes emphasises a partnership approach between health professionals and parents when it comes to child health care. Parents' voices have been largely absent from discussions about local child health programmes. For partnership working to be effective and for local services to be able to evolve effectively parents' views are vital.

Objectives. This study aimed to explore parents' views on the child health surveillance and health promotion programmes offered during the first year of their child's life. The study aimed to be consumer-led through the involvement of lead parents in all stages of the research process.

Methods. This study employed a qualitative methodology of focus groups and individual interviews. 35 participants were drawn from three general practices using a snowball sampling technique. Eligibility was determined as parents with a child under the age of one year or expecting a baby within the study timescale and registered at one of the 3 general practices. Focus groups were led by three ‘parent-researchers’ and individual interviews were conducted by a researcher. All focus groups and interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed and analysed using Atlas.Ti.

Results. Several main themes were identified in this study. Firstly, when discussing scheduled health checks for children under one year of age parents expressed more positive feelings for the eight-week check which was seen to be comprehensive and informative rather than the eight-month check which was viewed as bureaucratic and less reassuring. Secondly, parents clearly articulated a need for reassurance and support from health professionals involved in child health surveillance and health promotion programmes. Thirdly, a crucial professional in the delivery of these programmes was the health visitor. Whilst parents expressed support for the concept of health visitors some health visitors were seen as bureaucratic and as making judgements of need based on socio-economic factors. Finally, some parents spoke of feeling excluded from accessing support as they were deemed not to be ‘in need’.

Conclusions. Wider concepts of partnership working between health professionals and parents, and, needs assessment are important to this study. Crucial elements of the partnership appear to be missing and this coupled with needs assessments that leave parents feeling excluded mean that there are discrepancies between expectations and experiences of parents. These issues require consideration in order to improve services and experiences.

Keywords: Child development; child health services; health promotion; parent; qualitative research.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Women’s choices around contraception after childbirth
Rachel Wooldridge, et al.
Family Practice, 8 Nov 2005 [Full text]

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.