Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on August 17, 2005
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi077
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/1/91    most recent
cmi077v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calnan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Watkins, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calnan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Watkins, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received December 10, 2004
Accepted July 6, 2004

Article

Making sense of aches and pains

M. Calnan 1*, D. Wainwright 1, C. O'Neill 1, A. Winterbottom 1, and C. Watkins 1

1 MRC HSRC, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
M. Calnan, E-mail: m.w.calnan{at}bristol.ac.uk


  Abstract

Background. The uncertainty about the status of upper limb disorders (ULDs), particularly the non-specific conditions, is believed to have consequences for clinical management and patient care.

Objective. This paper presents evidence about how sufferers with ULDs respond to their pain, how their pain is managed, when and who they go to for formal help and how sufferers evaluate the care they receive.

Methods. The data analysis is derived from face-to-face, informal interviews with sufferers with a broad spectrum of upper limb disorders (n = 47). These informants were selected according to strict criteria from a ‘screening’ postal survey of the working population (25-64 years) in south-west England (n = 2781).

Results. Ideas about causation were crucial to understanding patterns of illness action and help seeking behaviour. The common strategy was to wait and see what happens as the pain was believed to be a natural part of the ageing process. Explanations invoking psychosocial and work related causes were less common and tended to be used when biomechanical explanations were no longer appropriate. Self-management was the preferred strategy but orthodox practitioners were usually the first choice for formal care. Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) were popular but were used to complement orthodox care. Practitioners were evaluated mainly in terms of their ability to alleviate pain.

Conclusion. There is a need for orthodox and non-orthodox care to be closely integrated in primary care and GPs should not depend on orthodox medications alone when caring for patients with upper limb pain.

Keywords: Health service use; illness behaviour; lay beliefs; upper limb disorders.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Board Fam MedHome page
T. C. Rosenthal
The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2008; 21(5): 427 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.