Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on November 24, 2005
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi099
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/1/125    most recent
cmi099v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ogden, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ogden, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received February 8, 2005
Accepted November 3, 2005

Article

Why do doctors issue sick notes? An experimental questionnaire study in primary care

Amaryllis Campbell 1 and Jane Ogden 2 *

1 Department of General Practice, Kings College London, UK
2 Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Jane Ogden, E-mail: J.Ogden{at}surrey.ac.uk


  Abstract

Background. Issuing sick notes is one of the core tasks of General Practice and yet little research has explored how doctors decide whether or not to offer a sick note.

Aim. To explore what factors influence this decision with a focus on the impact of type of problem (psychological versus physical), adverse family circumstances (present versus absent) and patient demand (asks for note versus does not ask).

Design. Experimental factorial design using questionnaire-based vignettes with eight scenarios which varied in terms of the three core factors.

Setting. East and West Sussex PCTs.

Outcome measures. Doctors' beliefs about the patient and their subsequent behaviour.

Participants. Four hundred and eighty-nine GPs completed a questionnaire asking them to rate one of eight hypothetical patients in terms of their beliefs about the patient and their hypothetical behaviour.

Results. The doctors rated the patient with the psychological problem as more ill, less work-shy, more unfit for work and described feeling more sympathy towards him compared with the patient with the physical problem. The presence of adverse family circumstances generated more sympathy and doctors considered this patient as less work-shy. A patient demand for a sick note had no effect on doctors' beliefs about the patient. In terms of doctors' behaviour, the doctors were more likely to give the patient with the psychological problem a sick note overall and because they felt he needed or deserved one, and more likely to give the patient with the physical problem a sick note in order to maintain a relationship with him. The decision to give a sick note was not influenced by either adverse family circumstances or patient demand.

Conclusion. Doctors have more positive beliefs about patients with a psychological problem and are more likely to offer them a sick note. Issuing sick notes is unrelated to the patient's family circumstances or patient demand.

Keywords: Sick notes; decision making; doctors' beliefs.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
K. O'Brien, N. Cadbury, S. Rollnick, and F. Wood
Sickness certification in the general practice consultation: the patients' perspective, a qualitative study
Fam. Pract., February 2, 2008; (2008) cmm076v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.