Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on December 16, 2005
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi103
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/2/210    most recent
cmi103v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Bültzingslöwen, I.
Right arrow Articles by Hjortdahl, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Bültzingslöwen, I.
Right arrow Articles by Hjortdahl, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received January 30, 2005
Accepted October 30, 2005

Article

Patients' views on interpersonal continuity in primary care: a sense of security based on four core foundations

Inger von Bültzingslöwen 1 *, Gösta Eliasson 2, Anneli Sarvimäki 3, Bengt Mattsson 4, and Per Hjortdahl 5

1 Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Göteborg, Sweden
2 Institute for Family Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
3 Age institute, Helsinki, Finland
4 Department of Primary Health Care, Göteborg University, Sweden
5 Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inger von Bültzingslöwen, E-mail: inger.von.bultzingslowen{at}liv.se


  Abstract

Background. A deep and comprehensive understanding of what patients value about having a personal doctor in primary care is lacking.

Objectives. To acquire a comprehensive understanding of the core values of having a personal doctor in a continuing doctor-patient relationship in primary care among long-term, chronically ill patients.

Method. In this qualitative study, 14 chronically ill patients at three primary health care centres were strategically selected. The centres were selected to include patients with experiences from both long-term and short-term doctors. The patients were asked about their views on having a personal doctor in a continuing doctor-patient relationship in primary care compared with having different short-term doctors. Sixteen health care professionals were interviewed about what chronically ill patients convey to them about having a personal doctor in contrast to seeing different short-term locum doctors. The in-depth interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed by qualitative content analysis.

Results. The core category, i.e. a universal concept that many patients used to describe the impact of having access to a personal doctor, was a sense of security. This was based on four main categories or core foundations which were: feelings of coherence, confidence in care, a trusting relationship and accessibility. In turn, the four main categories emerged from two to four of subcategories.

Conclusion. The foundations that underpin the value of personal care from the patients' perspective could be based on categories found in this study.

Keywords: Continuity of care; family medicine; general practice; primary care; qualitative study.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
K. Fletcher, J. Mant, R. Holder, D. Fitzmaurice, G. Y. Lip, and F. R. Hobbs
An analysis of factors that predict patient consent to take part in a randomized controlled trial
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2007; 24(4): 388 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.