Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on February 1, 2006
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi109
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/2/188    most recent
cmi109v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ivaz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Oakeshott, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ivaz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Oakeshott, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received June 24, 2005
Accepted December 18, 2005

Article

Lessons learned from recruiting young female students to a randomised controlled trial of chlamydia screening

Stella Ivaz 1, Sarah Brennan 1, Sally Dean 1, Sima Hay 1, Phillip Hay 1, Sally Kerry 1, and Pippa Oakeshott 1 *

1 Community Health Sciences, St George’s, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pippa Oakeshott, E-mail: oakeshot{at}sgul.ac.uk


  Abstract

Background. Recruitment is a problem in many trials. Two female medical students offered to help with recruiting problems in a community-based trial of chlamydia screening to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease. We need to recruit 2500 sexually active female students and ask them to provide a self-taken low vaginal swab and complete a questionnaire with follow-up after a year.

Objectives. To identify recruitment difficulties in a community-based trial of chlamydia screening and to investigate how they might be overcome.

Design. Descriptive study.

Setting. London South Bank and Kingston Universities.

Methods. The students observed the recruitment methods used for the first 4 months of the trial. This comprised single researchers recruiting individual women in student bars and common rooms. With the researchers they piloted a new method of group recruitment with pairs of researchers making announcements at the end of lectures after first sending out all male students and those aged >25 years. This involved extra time planning and liaising with the lecturers in advance of recruitment sessions.

Results. The recruitment rate had been averaging only 25 participants per week. Many students were ineligible: never been sexually active, too old, recently been tested for chlamydia. Many eligible students were reluctant to take part because of embarrassment or anxiety about providing a swab. Using a new method of group recruitment after lectures we recruited 192 participants in 2 weeks.

Conclusion. For a study on a sensitive topic, two researchers recruiting women in groups after lectures may be a more effective and cost-effective way than individual recruitment by researchers working alone.

Keywords: Recruitment; randomised controlled trial; chlamydia; screening.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.