Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on January 31, 2006
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi123
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/2/192    most recent
cmi123v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drivsholm, T.
Right arrow Articles by Olivarius, N. d. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drivsholm, T.
Right arrow Articles by Olivarius, N. d. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received July 6, 2005
Accepted December 28, 2005

Article

General practitioners may diagnose type 2 diabetes mellitus at an early disease stage in patients they know well

Thomas Drivsholm 1 * and Niels de Fine Olivarius 1

1 The Research Unit and Department of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Thomas Drivsholm, E-mail: thomas.drivsholm{at}gpract.ku.dk


  Abstract

Background. Continuity of care may not only save time and money for the health care system, but may also be beneficial for the individual patient. How well GPs know their patients may potentially lead to an early diagnosis of a slowly progressive chronic disease like type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this paper is to investigate this hypothesis.

Methods. A cross-sectional, population-based study of 1136 patients newly diagnosed with T2DM by their GP. Our main outcomes were how well the GPs' knew their patients (questionnaire) and centralized analysis of glycosylated haemoglobin A1c. Multivariate linear regression models were used to allow adjustment for confounding variables.

Results. GPs classified how well they knew their patients as being not well for 13.5% (153/1136) of their patients, as fairly well for 38.6% (438/1136) and as very well for 48.0% (545/1136). Patients whom the GPs classified as not knowing well had relatively high glycaemic levels compared with levels among other patients, a finding that was confirmed in multivariate linear regression models.

Conclusions. Our data show that the glycaemic level among patients whom the GP characterize as knowing well or fairly well is relatively low compared with among patients whom the GP characterize as not knowing well. We suggest that this reflects a late diagnosis in these patients, and that GPs should be especially aware of undiagnosed T2DM among patients whom they do not know well.

Keywords: Continuity of patient care; epidemiology; family practice; glycaemia; type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.