Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on February 3, 2006

Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi124
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/2/167    most recent
cmi124v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruigómez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruigómez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received July 4, 2005
Accepted December 28, 2005

Article

Chest pain in general practice: incidence, comorbidity and mortality

Ana Ruigómez 1 *, Luis Alberto García Rodríguez 1, Mari-Ann Wallander 2, Saga Johansson 2, and Roger Jones 3

1 Centro Español de Investigación Farmacoepidemiológica (CEIFE), Madrid, Spain
2 AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden
3 Department of General Practice and Primary Care, King’s College, London, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ana Ruigómez, E-mail: aruigomez{at}ceife.es


   Abstract

Background. Chest pain is a common symptom that presents the primary care physician with a complex diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Aims. To evaluate the natural history and management of patients diagnosed with chest pain of unspecified type or origin in primary care.

Design. Population-based case-control study.

Methods. The study included 13 740 patients with a first diagnosis of unspecified chest pain and 20 000 age- and sex-matched controls identified from the UK General Practice Research Database. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using unconditional logistic regression. Risk estimates were adjusted for age, sex and number of physician visits.

Results. The incidence of a new diagnosis of chest pain was 15.5 per 1000 person-years and increased with age, particularly in men. The risk of a chest pain diagnosis was greatest in patients with prior diagnoses of coronary heart disease (OR: 7.1; 95% CI: 6.1-8.2) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.7-2.3). In the year after diagnosis, chest pain patients were more likely than controls to be newly diagnosed with coronary heart disease (OR: 14.9; 95% CI: 12.7-17.4) and heart failure (OR: 4.7; 95% CI: 3.6-6.1). A new diagnosis of chest pain was associated with an increased risk of death in the following year (RR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.9-2.8).

Conclusions. Some causes of chest pain are underdiagnosed in primary care. This is of particular consequence for the minority of chest pain patients with cardiac disease.

Keywords: Chest pain; automated database; population-based sudy; primary care; incidence.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M.-A. Wallander, S. Johansson, A. Ruigomez, L. A. Garcia Rodriguez, and R. Jones
Dyspepsia in general practice: incidence, risk factors, comorbidity and mortality
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2007; 24(5): 403 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
cfpHome page
N. Flook, P. Unge, L. Agreus, B. W. Karlson, and S. Nilsson
Approach to managing undiagnosed chest pain: Could gastroesophageal reflux disease be the cause?
Can Fam Physician, February 1, 2007; 53(2): 261 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.