Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on March 7, 2006
Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cml002
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/3/349    most recent
cml002v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schers, H.
Right arrow Articles by van den Bosch, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schers, H.
Right arrow Articles by van den Bosch, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received July 25, 2005
Accepted January 30, 2006

Article

Continuity of care through medical records--an explorative study on GPs' management considerations

Henk Schers 1, Henk van den Hoogen 1, Richard Grol 2, and Wil van den Bosch 1

1 Department of General Practice, University Medical Centre St Radboud Nijmegen, The Netherlands
2 Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), University Medical Centre St Radboud Nijmegen and University of Maastricht, The Netherlands


  Abstract

Background. The growing complexity of care with more professionals involved is a threat to the delivery of coherent and consistent care. Excellent exchange of information between professionals may be a way to maintain continuity of care. Relevant information to be passed over includes thoughts about future management for individual patients.

Aim. To explore the nature of GPs' thoughts about future management, and to determine the extent to which such thoughts are actually recorded in medical records.

Design of study. Cross-sectional study of 5741 consultations.

Setting. Thirty GPs from 17 practices in a region in the eastern part of The Netherlands.

Methods. The GPs responded to an electronic questionnaire, directly after 200 successive consultations. The questionnaire included items on management considerations, consultation characteristics and personal continuity. We compared the data from the questionnaire to the actual recording of management considerations in the patient records.

Results. The GPs had management considerations in 66.4% of the consultations, involving mainly considerations about additional testing (15.5%), adjustment of medication (22.5%), alternative treatment plans (18.6%), possible referral (11.8%) and coping behaviour (18.0%). These considerations were seldom recorded in the electronic patient record; additional testing (3.0%) adjustment of medication (2.9%) and alternative treatment plans (4.1%). Surprisingly however, GPs rarely found that management considerations from earlier consultations were lacking in the medical record.

Conclusion. GPs often have thoughts on how to deal with this patient, but hardly ever record such considerations. We recommend the development of tools that facilitate the recording of management considerations in electronic patient records.

Keywords: Continuity of patient care; computerized medical records systems.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 cfpHome page
K. Schultz
Strategies to enhance teaching about continuity of care
Can Fam Physician, June 1, 2009; 55(6): 666 - 668.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.