Skip Navigation



Family Practice Advance Access published online on June 20, 2006

Family Practice, doi:10.1093/fampra/cml023
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/5/512    most recent
cml023v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopstaken, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dinant, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hopstaken, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dinant, G. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Received June 7, 2005
Accepted April 24, 2006

Article

Prognostic factors and clinical outcome in acute lower respiratory tract infections: a prospective study in general practice

R. M. Hopstaken 1 *, S. Coenen 2, C. C. Butler 3, P Nelemans 4, J. W. M. Muris 5, P. E. L. M. Rinkens 5, A. D. M. Kester 6, and G. J. Dinant 5

1 Institution of Health Centres Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of General Practice, Care and Public Health Research Institute (Caphri), University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
2 Department of General Practice, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders, Brussels, Belgium
3 Department of General Practice, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
4 Department of Epidemiology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
5 Department of General Practice, Care and Public Health Research Institute (Caphri), University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
6 Department of Methodology and Statistics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
R. M. Hopstaken, E-mail: rogier.hopstaken{at}hag.unimaas.nl


   Abstract

Background. Unrealistic expectations about illness duration are likely to result in reconsultations and associated unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions. An evidence-based account of clinical outcomes in patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) may help avoid unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions and reconsultations.

Objectives. We aimed to identify clinical factors that may predict a prolonged clinical course or poor outcome for patients with LRTI and to provide an evidence-based account of duration of an LRTI and the impact of the illness on daily activities in patients consulting in general practice.

Methods. A prospective cohort study of 247 adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of LRTI presenting to 25 GPs in The Netherlands was carried out. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify baseline clinical and infection parameters that predicted the time taken for symptoms to resolve. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyse time-to-symptom resolution. Clinical cure was recorded by the GPs at 28 days after the initial consultation and by the patients at 27 days.

Results. Co-morbidity of asthma was a statistically significant predictor of delayed symptom resolution, whereas the presence of fever, perspiring and the prescription of an antibiotic weakly predicted enhanced symptom resolution. The GPs considered 89% of the patients clinically cured at 28 days, but 43% of these nevertheless reported ongoing symptoms. Patient-reported cure was much lower (51%), and usual daily activities were limited in 73% of the patients at baseline, and 19% at final follow-up.

Conclusions. The course of LRTI was generally uncomplicated, but the morbidity of this illness was considerable with a longer duration than generally reported, especially for patients with co-existent asthma. These results underline once again the importance of providing GPs with an evidence-based account of outcomes to share with patients in order to set realistic expectations and of enhancing their communication skills within the consultation.

Keywords: Prognosis; respiratory track infections; general practice; antibiotics; pneumonia.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.